Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427424›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2020

Systematic review of the efficacy of topical haemoglobin therapy for wound healing.

Jieman Hu, Shaoning Guo, Haiyan Hu, Jianan Sun

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. M.O.I.S.T. Concept for the Local Therapy of Chronic Wounds: An International Update.The international journal of lower extremity wounds · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jieman HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shaoning GuoSchool of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Haiyan HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jianan SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jilin University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771093the Project of Medical Talents of Jilin Province JLSCED2019-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia is a common cause of poor wound healing, for which a variety of oxygen therapies have been developed. In order to overcome the limitations of traditional methods of treatment, namely the type of equipment, its setting, safety and cost, local haemoglobin therapy has been developed, although no reviews have so far been published. Here, we systematically review the current evidence to establish the efficacy, scope, adverse reactions, and required precautions of this new form of therapy. A search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of science databases, with 17 studies meeting the eligibility criteria, comprising one animal model study and 16 clinical studies. Local haemoglobin therapy is able to safely and effectively promote the healing of a variety of wounds, especially those that are chronic and non-healing. However, premature discontinuation of this treatment can result in impediment to wound healing and even deterioration of the wound. The distinct benefit of the elimination of slough and relief of pain suggests that this technique may represent a new generation of debridement technology. Furthermore, its ease of use and convenience enables patient self-management, thereby greatly reducing health care costs.

Indexed as

HemoglobinsWound HealingHumansPainHemoglobinslocal haemoglobin therapynon-healing woundpainsystematic reviewwound healing

Identifiers

PMID32427424
PMCPMC7948847
OpenAlexW3027831600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.