Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427350›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2020

Utility of genetic testing for therapeutic decision-making in adults with epilepsy.

Katrine M Johannesen, Natalya Nikanorova, Dragan Marjanovic, Agnieszka Pavbro, Line H G Larsen, Guido Rubboli, Rikke S Møller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneity of monogenic epilepsy in loci, phenotypes, and treatment approaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Epilepsy disease classification: a community effort to enhance the Mondo Disease Ontology.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Further advances in epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katrine M JohannesenDepartment of Epilepsy Genetics and Personalized Treatment, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-3109
Natalya NikanorovaDepartment of Epilepsy Genetics and Personalized Treatment, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.
Dragan MarjanovicDepartment of Neurology, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.
Agnieszka PavbroDepartment of Neurology, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.
Line H G LarsenAmplexa Genetics, Odense, Denmark.
Guido RubboliDepartment of Epilepsy Genetics and Personalized Treatment, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-2514
Rikke S MøllerDepartment of Epilepsy Genetics and Personalized Treatment, Danish Epilepsy Center, Dianalund, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-1448
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGenetic testing has become a routine part of the diagnostic workup in children with early onset epilepsies. In the present study, we sought to investigate a cohort of adult patients with epilepsy, to determinate the diagnostic yield and explore the gain of personalized treatment approaches in adult patients.

methodsTwo hundred patients (age span = 18-80 years) referred for diagnostic gene panel testing at the Danish Epilepsy Center were included. The vast majority (91%) suffered from comorbid intellectual disability. The medical records of genetically diagnosed patients were mined for data on epilepsy syndrome, cognition, treatment changes, and seizure outcome following the genetic diagnosis.

resultsWe found a genetic diagnosis in 46 of 200 (23%) patients. SCN1A, KCNT1, and STXBP1 accounted for the greatest number of positive findings (48%). More rare genetic findings included SLC2A1, ATP6A1V, HNRNPU, MEF2C, and IRF2BPL. Gene-specific treatment changes were initiated in 11 of 46 (17%) patients (one with SLC2A1, 10 with SCN1A) following the genetic diagnosis. Ten patients improved, with seizure reduction and/or increased alertness and general well-being. SIGNIFICANCE: With this study, we show that routine diagnostic testing is highly relevant in adults with epilepsy. The diagnostic yield is similar to previously reported pediatric cohorts, and the genetic findings can be useful for therapeutic decision-making, which may lead to better seizure control, ultimately improving quality of life.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingDenmarkEpilepsyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsPotassium Channels, Sodium-ActivatedYoung AdultKCNT1 protein, humanNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsPotassium Channels, Sodium-ActivatedSCN1A protein, humanadultsgene panelgenetic testingNGS

Identifiers

PMID32427350
OpenAlexW3026426463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.