Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427325›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Congruence Gaps Between Adolescents With Cancer and Their Families Regarding Values, Goals, and Beliefs About End-of-Life Care.

Sarah Friebert, Daniel H Grossoehme, Justin N Baker, Jennifer Needle, Jessica D Thompkins, Yao I Cheng, Jichuan Wang, Maureen E Lyon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02693665 (Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02693665 nacompletednot on this map

Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaureen LyonRan2016 to 2022Enrolled260ConditionsCancerArmsFAmily CEntered Advance Care Planning for Teens with Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 'You Can't Muck Around With Transplant': Young People's Experiences of Clinical Care Following Lung Transplant.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah FriebertHaslinger Family Pediatric Palliative Care Center, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Daniel H GrossoehmeHaslinger Family Pediatric Palliative Care Center, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio.
Justin N BakerDivision of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St Jude Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Jennifer NeedleCenter for Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Jessica D ThompkinsCenter for Translational Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Yao I ChengDivision of Biostatistics and Study Methodology, Center for Translational Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Jichuan WangDivision of Biostatistics and Study Methodology, Center for Translational Research, Children's Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Maureen E LyonGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Akron Children's Hospital · USGeorge Washington University · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalUL1TR000075 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$13.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031988 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$8.2M
Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens with CancerR01NR015458 · NINR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LYON, MAUREEN ELLEN · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Palliative Care in People Living with AIDS: Integrating into Standard of CareR01NR014052 · NINR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LYON, MAUREEN ELLEN · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000075NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031988NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014052NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lack of pediatric advance care planning has been associated with poor communication, increased hospitalization, poor quality of life, and legal actions. Clinicians presume that families understand adolescents' treatment preferences for end-of-life care. Objective: To examine patient-reported end-of-life values and needs of adolescents with cancer and congruence with their families' understanding of these needs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among adolescent-family dyads from July 16, 2016, to April 30, 2019, at 4 tertiary care pediatric US hospitals. Participants included 80 adolescent-family dyads (160 participants) within a larger study facilitating pediatric advance care planning. Adolescent eligibility criteria included being aged 14 to 21 years, English speaking, being diagnosed with cancer at any stage, and knowing their diagnosis. Family included legal guardians for minors or chosen surrogate decision-makers for those aged 18 years or older. Data analysis was performed from April 2019 to November 2019. Exposure: Session 1 of the 3-session Family Centered Pediatric Advance Care Planning for Teens With Cancer intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was congruence between adolescents with cancer and their families regarding adolescents' values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life care. Prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ (PABAK) values were used to measure congruence on the Lyon Advance Care Planning Survey-Revised (Patient and Surrogate versions). Results: A total of 80 adolescent-family dyads (160 participants) were randomized to the intervention group in the original trial. Among the adolescents, 44 (55.0%) were female and 60 (75.0%) were white, with a mean (SD) age of 16.9 (1.8) years. Among family members, 66 (82.5%) were female and 65 (81.3%) were white, with a mean (SD) age of 45.3 (8.3) years. Family members' understanding of their adolescent's beliefs about the best time bring up end-of-life decisions was poor: 86% of adolescents wanted early timing (before getting sick, while healthy, when first diagnosed, when first sick from a life-threatening illness, or all of the above), but only 39% of families knew this (PABAK, 0.18). Families' understanding of what was important to their adolescents when dealing with their own dying was excellent for wanting honest answers from their physician (PABAK, 0.95) and understanding treatment choices (PABAK, 0.95) but poor for dying a natural death (PABAK, 0.18) and being off machines that extend life, if dying (PABAK, 0). Conclusions and Relevance: Many families had a poor understanding of their adolescent's values regarding their own end-of-life care, such as when to initiate end-of-life conversations and preference for being off machines that extend life. Pediatric advance care planning could minimize these misunderstandings with the potential for a substantial impact on quality of care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningPsychology, AdolescentTerminal CareUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32427325
PMCPMC7237980
OpenAlexW3026293428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.