Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32427280›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020

Thyroid function in neonates conceived after hysterosalpingography with iodinated contrast.

N van Welie, I Roest, M Portela, J van Rijswijk, C Koks, C B Lambalk, K Dreyer, B W J Mol, M J J Finken, V Mijatovic and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Utility of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with Sonazoid®: a single-center experience.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knowns and unknowns about congenital hypothyroidism: 2022 update.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

N van WelieDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
I RoestDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M PortelaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J van RijswijkDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C KoksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
C B LambalkDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
K DreyerDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
B W J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Scenic Blvd, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
M J J FinkenDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
V MijatovicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H2Oil Study Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLMonash University · AURadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes exposure to preconceptional hysterosalpingography (HSG) with iodinated oil-based contrast affect neonatal thyroid function as compared to iodinated water-based contrast? SUMMARY ANSWER: Preconceptional HSG with iodinated contrast did not influence the neonatal thyroid function. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: HSG is a commonly applied tubal patency test during fertility work-up in which either oil- or water-based contrast is used. Oil-based contrast contains more iodine compared to water-based contrast. A previous study in an East Asian population found an increased risk of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in neonates whose mothers were exposed to high amounts of oil-based contrast during HSG. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective data analysis of the H2Oil study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing HSG with the use of oil- versus water-based contrast during fertility work-up. After an HSG with oil-based contrast, 214 women had an ongoing pregnancy within 6 months leading to a live birth compared to 155 women after HSG with water-based contrast. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsOf the 369 women who had a live born infant, 208 consented to be approached for future research and 138 provided informed consent to collect data on the thyroid function tests of their offspring (n = 140). Thyroid function tests of these children were retrieved from the Dutch neonatal screening program, which includes the assessment of total thyroxine (T4) in all newborns, followed by thyroid-stimulating hormone only in those with a T4 level of ≤ -0.8 SD score. Furthermore, amount of contrast medium used and time between HSG and conception were compared between the two study groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Data were collected from 140 neonates conceived after HSG with oil-based (n = 76) or water-based (n = 64) contrast. The median T4 concentration was 87.0 nmol/l [76.0-96.0] in the oil group and 90.0 nmol/l [78.0-106.0] in the water group (P = 0.13). None of the neonates had a positive screening result for CH.The median amount of contrast medium used was 9.0 ml [interquartile range (IQR), 6.0-11.8] in the oil-group and 10.0 ml [IQR, 7.5-14.0] in the water group (P = 0.43). No influence of the amount of contrast on the effect of contrast group on T4 concentrations was found (P-value for interaction, 0.37). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A relatively small sample size and possible attrition at follow-up are limitations of this study. Although our results suggest that the use of iodinated contrast media for HSG is safe for the offspring, the impact of a decrease in maternal thyroid function on offspring neurodevelopment could not be excluded, as data on maternal thyroid function after HSG and during conception were lacking. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsAs HSG with oil-based contrast does not affect thyroid function of the offspring, there is no reason to withhold this contrast to infertile women undergoing HSG. Future studies should investigate whether HSG with iodinated contrast influences the periconceptional maternal thyroid function and, consequently, offspring neurodevelopment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study received no funding. The original H2Oil RCT was an investigator-initiated study that was funded by the two academic institutions (Academic Medical Center and VU University Medical Center) of the Amsterdam UMC. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis and intrepretation of the data. I.R. reports receiving travel fee from Guerbet. C.B.L. reports speakers fee from Ferring in the past and research grants from Ferring, Merck and Guerbet. K.D. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee from Guerbet. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet and travel and research grants from Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V.M. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee as well as research grants from Guerbet. The other authors do not report conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register NTR 7526 (Neonates born after the H2Oil study), NTR 3270 (original H2Oil study), www.trialregister.nl.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaHysterosalpingographyChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancyPregnancy RateThyroid GlandContrast Mediahypothyroidismhysterosalpingographyiodineneonatal healthneonatal screeningoil-based contrast mediumwater-based contrast medium

Identifiers

PMID32427280
PMCPMC7259368
OpenAlexW3026901878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.