ArticleJournal of anatomy2020
Isolation and next generation sequencing of archival formalin-fixed DNA.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA extraction from long-term preserved formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of thymic epithelial tumours - a performance comparison of three commercial kits.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2025Article
- Buffered Lugol's Iodine Preserves DNA Fragment Lengths.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Isolation and next generation sequencing of archival formalin-fixed DNA.Journal of anatomy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA from archived organs is presumed unsuitable for genomic studies because of excessive formalin-fixation. As next generation sequencing (NGS) requires short DNA fragments, and Uracil-N-glycosylase (UNG) can be used to overcome deamination, there has been renewed interest in the possibility of genomic studies using these collections. We describe a novel method of DNA extraction capable of providing PCR amplicons of at least 400 bp length from such excessively formalin-fixed human tissues. When compared with a leading commercial formalin-fixed DNA extraction kit, our method produced greater yields of DNA and reduced sequence variations. Analysis of PCR products using bacterial sub-cloning and Sanger sequencing from UNG-treated DNA unexpectedly revealed increased sequence variations, compared with untreated samples. Finally, whole exome NGS was performed on a myocardial sample fixed in formalin for 2 years and compared with lymphocyte-derived DNA (as a gold standard) from the same patient. Despite the reduction in the number and quality of reads in the formalin-fixed DNA, we were able to show that bioinformatic processing by joint calling and variant quality score recalibration (VQSR) increased the sensitivity four-fold to 56% and doubled specificity to 68% when compared with a standard hard-filtering approach. Thus, high-quality DNA can be extracted from excessively formalin-fixed tissues and bioinformatic processing can optimise sensitivity and specificity of results. Sequencing of several sub-cloned amplicons is an important methodological step in assessing DNA quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.