ArticleCritical care explorations2020
Procedures Performed by Advanced Practice Providers Compared With Medical Residents in the ICU: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous ablation procedures by provider type, including advanced practice providers.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Article
- Charting Tomorrow's Healthcare: A Traditional Literature Review for an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Future.Cureus · 2024Review
- Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries in Resource-Limited Setting: A 4-Year Experience Monocentric Retrospective Study.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2024Article
- Advanced Practice Providers as Leaders of a Rapid Response Team: A Prospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Declining Procedures in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Using a National Database.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the frequency and safety of procedures performed by advanced practice providers and medical residents in a mixed-bed ICU.
designA prospective observational study where consecutive invasive procedures were studied over a period of 1 year and 8 months. The interventions were registered anonymously in an online database. Endpoints were success rate at first attempt, number of attempts, complications, level of supervision, and teamwork.
settingA 33-bedded mixed ICU. SUBJECTS: Advanced practice providers and medical residents.
interventionsRegistration of the performance of tracheal intubation, central venous and arterial access, tube thoracostomies, interhospital transportation, and electrical cardioversion. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
resultsA full-time advanced practice provider performed an average of 168 procedures and a medical resident an average of 68. The advanced practice provider inserted significant more radial, brachial, and femoral artery catheters (66% vs 74%,
conclusionsAdvanced practice providers in critical care performed procedures safe and effectively when compared with medical residents. Advanced practice providers appear to be a valuable addition to the professional staff in critical care when it comes to invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.