Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426703›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2020

Tracheostomy colonisation and microbiological isolates of patients in intensive care units-a retrospective study.

Segana Hasan Abdul Cader, Fahim Ahmed Shah, S K G Reghunandanan Nair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Active Screening forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Factors associated withJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Biofilm Formation of ClinicalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Segana Hasan Abdul CaderDepartment of ENT, Sur Hospital, South Sharqiya Region, Sur, Sultanate of Oman.
Fahim Ahmed ShahDepartment of ENT, Sur Hospital, South Sharqiya Region, Sur, Sultanate of Oman.
S K G Reghunandanan NairDepartment of ENT, Sur Hospital, South Sharqiya Region, Sur, Sultanate of Oman.
Sur University College · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo find out the type of bacteria colonising the tracheostomy tube and to determine the antibiotic sensitivity pattern and resistance in patients who have had tracheostomy in intensive care unit (ICU) set up and to initiate proper empirical treatment in such patients.

methodsThe study was a retrospective review of patients who underwent tracheostomy at Ministry of Health, Sur Hospital, Oman January 2005 and December 2015. The Hospital has 4 bedded pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and 10 bedded adult ICU which is headed by consultant anaesthetists, consultant physicians, ICU trained nurses and respiratory therapists. All patients who required mechanical ventilation and were therefore subject to an orotracheal intubation and those who underwent a conventional tracheostomy were considered for inclusion. Patients who had been intubated in other hospitals or ICUs, other airways infection issues were excluded from this study. Data's were collected from computer based hospital management system, operation theatre and registers in Medical records department and entered in a preformed questionnaire before thorough analysis. The specimens for swab was obtained from the cut tracheostomy tube tips and the samples were sent to microbiology laboratory for isolation of the organism and obtain an antibiogram to know the susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics. Data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 16, Chicago, Inc) and the values are reported as number (%). The commonest isolated organism was

resultsDuring the ten year retrospective study, there were 108 patients included in our study with 56 males and 51 females. Fourteen different microorganisms were isolated during our study which included

conclusionsIn summary, this study presents the most common microorganisms colonized from tracheostomy of hospitalized patients and their pattern of antibiotic resistance. As our study showed,

Indexed as

AntibiogramAntibioticsIntubationTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID32426703
PMCPMC7221207
OpenAlexW3013493164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.