Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426422›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

An Interpretive Description of Women's Experience in Coordinated, Multidisciplinary Treatment for an Eating Disorder.

Kary Woodruff, Lauren Clark, Elizabeth Joy, Scott A Summers, Julie M Metos, Nica Clark, Kristine C Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kary WoodruffThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-2891
Lauren ClarkUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Elizabeth JoyThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Scott A SummersThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Julie M MetosThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Nica ClarkSouthern Utah University, Cedar City, Utah, USA.
Kristine C JordanThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated, multidisciplinary treatment for women with eating disorders is consistently recommended as maximally effective, but few studies have considered the patient experience. This qualitative study examined the experiences of women receiving such care in an outpatient setting. Using an interpretive description methodology, we conducted 12 in-depth interviews with participants who were diagnosed with an eating disorder and were receiving team-based treatment. Patients uniformly advocated for the coordinated, multidisciplinary treatment approach. Analysis of participants' experiences yielded four categories: relying on the lifeline of communication, supporting autonomy, drawing on individual strengths, and valuing synergy. These findings build on previous research emphasizing the importance of autonomy support and connectedness in the recovery process from an eating disorder. Findings highlight the importance of nurses to support a multidisciplinary care approach to working with this patient population; these women's voices also support a treatment approach that, despite being widely recommended, is vastly understudied and underutilized.

Indexed as

coordinationeating disordermultidisciplinary carepatient experiencequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID32426422
PMCPMC7218325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.