Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426215›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Association between colorectal cancer testing and insurance type: Evidence from the Swiss Health Interview Survey 2012.

Alexander Leonhard Braun, Anja Kässner, Lamprini Syrogiannouli, Kevin Selby, Jean-Luc Bulliard, Yonas Martin, Idris Guessous, Kali Tal, Cinzia Del Giovane, Marcel Zwahlen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Leonhard BraunInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Anja KässnerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Lamprini SyrogiannouliInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Kevin SelbyCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Luc BulliardCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yonas MartinInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Idris GuessousUnit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care and Emergency Medicine (UEP), Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Kali TalInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Cinzia Del GiovaneInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Marcel ZwahlenInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Reto AuerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) are commonly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but colonoscopy costs much more than FOBT. Swiss insurance offers high or low deductibles and choice of basic or private insurance. We hypothesized that high deductibles and basic insurance discourage colonoscopy, but do not change FOBT rates. We determined the proportion of patients tested for CRC in Switzerland (colonoscopy within 10 years, FOBT within 2 years), and determined associations with health insurance type. We extracted data on 50-75-year-olds from the Swiss Health Interview Surveys of 2012 to determine colonoscopy and FOBT testing rates (n = 7335). Multivariate logistic regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) of CRC testing associated with health insurance type (deductible and private insurance), adjusted for socio-demographic factors (age, gender, education, income) and self-rated health. The weighted proportion of individuals tested for CRC within recommended intervals was 39.5%. Testing with colonoscopy was significantly associated with private insurance (PR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.46-2.35) and low deductible (PR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.56-2.57). Testing with FOBT was significantly associated with deductible (PR 1.71, 95%CI:1.09-2.68) but not with private insurance. About 60% of the Swiss population was not current with CRC testing. After adjusting for covariates, private insurance and low deductible was significantly associated with higher prevalence of CRC testing, indicating that waiving the deductible could increase CRC screening uptake and reduce health inequality.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal cancer screeningFOBTHealth insuranceScreening ratesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID32426215
PMCPMC7226870
OpenAlexW3021628814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.