Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426158›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Feasibility of an implementation intervention to increase attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening: protocol for a cluster randomised pilot trial.

Fiona Riordan, Emmy Racine, Susan M Smith, Aileen Murphy, John Browne, Patricia M Kearney, Colin Bradley, Mark James, Mark Murphy, Sheena M McHugh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03901898 (Feasibility of an Implementation Intervention to Increase Attendance at Diabetic Retinopathy Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03901898 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility of an Implementation Intervention to Increase Attendance at Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Protocol for a Cluster Randomised Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College CorkRan2019 to 2020Enrolled8ConditionsDiabetes, RetinopathyArmsTraining, audit, and reminders, Intervention after 6 months (wait list)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona Riordan1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-4729
Emmy Racine1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland.
Susan M Smith2Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Aileen Murphy3Department of Economics, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
John Browne1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland.
Patricia M Kearney1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland.
Colin Bradley4Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mark James5Medical Education Unit, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mark Murphy2Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sheena M McHugh1School of Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Rd, Cork, Ireland.
University College Cork · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) leads to the earlier detection of retinopathy and treatment that can prevent or delay the development of diabetes-related blindness. However, uptake continues to be sub-optimal in many countries, including Ireland. Routine management of type 2 diabetes largely takes place in primary care. As such, there may be an opportunity in primary care to introduce interventions to improve DRS uptake. However, few studies test the feasibility of interventions to enhance DRS uptake in this context. Our aim is to investigate the feasibility of an implementation intervention (IDEAs (Improving Diabetes Eye screening Attendance)) delivered in general practice to improve the uptake of the national DRS programme, RetinaScreen.

methodsThe IDEAs study is a cluster randomised pilot trial with an embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation. Following stratification by practice size, eight general practices (clusters) will be randomly allocated to intervention ( DISCUSSION: Findings will determine whether IDEAsis feasible and acceptable and will be used to refine the intervention and study procedures. A definitive trial will determine whether IDEAs is a cost-effective intervention to improve DRS uptake and reduce diabetes-related blindness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03901898. Registered 3rd April 2019.

Indexed as

Family practitionerFeasibilityImplementation interventionPilot trialRetinal screening

Identifiers

PMID32426158
PMCPMC7216495
OpenAlexW3026346352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.