Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426124›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2020

Validating a GPS-based approach to detect health facility visits against maternal response to prompted recall survey.

Andrew Marsh, Siddhivinayak Hirve, Pallavi Lele, Uddhavi Chavan, Tathagata Bhattacharjee, Harish Nair, Harry Campbell, Sanjay Juvekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew MarshInstitute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Siddhivinayak HirveKEM Hospital Research Centre, Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.
Pallavi LeleKEM Hospital Research Centre, Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.
Uddhavi ChavanKEM Hospital Research Centre, Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.
Tathagata BhattacharjeeKEM Hospital Research Centre, Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.
Harish NairUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry CampbellUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sanjay JuvekarKEM Hospital Research Centre, Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommon approaches to measure health behaviors rely on participant responses and are subject to bias. Technology-based alternatives, particularly using GPS, address these biases while opening new channels for research. This study describes the development and implementation of a GPS-based approach to detect health facility visits in rural Pune district, India.

methodsParticipants were mothers of under-five year old children within the Vadu Demographic Surveillance area. Participants received GPS-enabled smartphones pre-installed with a location-aware application to continuously record and transmit participant location data to a central server. Data were analyzed to identify health facility visits according to a parameter-based approach, optimal thresholds of which were calibrated through a simulation exercise. Lists of GPS-detected health facility visits were generated at each of six follow-up home visits and reviewed with participants through prompted recall survey, confirming visits which were correctly identified. Detected visits were analyzed using logistic regression to explore factors associated with the identification of false positive GPS-detected visits.

resultsWe enrolled 200 participants and completed 1098 follow-up visits over the six-month study period. Prompted recall surveys were completed for 694 follow-up visits with one or more GPS-detected health facility visits. While the approach performed well during calibration (positive predictive value (PPV) 78%), performance was poor when applied to participant data. Only 440 of 22 251 detected visits were confirmed (PPV 2%). False positives increased as participants spent more time in areas of high health facility density (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62-3.25). Visits detected at facilities other than hospitals and clinics were also more likely to be false positives (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.65-4.67) as were visits detected to facilities nearby participant homes, with the likelihood decreasing as distance increased (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.97). Visit duration was not associated with confirmation status.

conclusionsThe optimal parameter combination for health facility visits simulated by field workers substantially overestimated health visits from participant GPS data. This study provides useful insights into the challenges in detecting health facility visits where providers are numerous, highly clustered within urban centers and located near residential areas of the population which they serve.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsMental RecallAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaInfantMiddle AgedMothersReproducibility of ResultsRural Population

Identifiers

PMID32426124
PMCPMC7211413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.