Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426095›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2020

Contemporary indications for and outcomes of hepatic resection for neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Steven D Scoville, Dimitrios Xourafas, Aslam M Ejaz, Allan Tsung, Timothy Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven D ScovilleDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Dimitrios XourafasDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Aslam M EjazDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Allan TsungDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Timothy PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Jordan M CloydDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough surgical resection is associated with the best long-term outcomes for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), the current indications for and outcomes of surgery for NELM from a population perspective are not well understood.

aimTo determine the current indications for and outcomes of liver resection (LR) for NELM using a population-based cohort.

methodsA retrospective review of the 2014-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and targeted hepatectomy databases was performed to identify patients who underwent LR for NELM. Perioperative characteristics and 30-d morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

resultsAmong 669 patients who underwent LR for NELM, the median age was 60 (interquartile range: 51-67) and 51% were male. While the number of metastases resected ranged from 1 to 9, the most common (45%) number of tumors resected was one. The majority (68%) of patients had a largest tumor size of < 5 cm. Most patients underwent partial hepatectomy (71%) while fewer underwent a right or left hepatectomy or trisectionectomy. The majority of operations were open (82%) versus laparoscopic (17%) or robotic (1%). In addition, 30% of patients underwent intraoperative ablation while 45% had another concomitant operation including cholecystectomy (28.8%), bowel resection (20.2%), or partial pancreatectomy (3.4%). Overall 30-d morbidity and mortality was 29% and 1.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 [odds ratios (OR), OR = 2.089, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.197-3.645], open approach (OR = 1.867, 95%CI: 1.148-3.036), right hepatectomy (OR = 1.618, 95%CI: 1.014-2.582), and prolonged operative time of > 230 min (OR = 1.731, 95%CI: 1.168-2.565) were associated with higher 30-d morbidity while intraoperative ablation and concomitant procedures were not.

conclusionLR for NELM was performed with relatively low postoperative morbidity and mortality. Concomitant procedures performed at the time of LR did not increase morbidity.

Indexed as

CarcinoidCholecystectomyIntraoperative ablationNeuroendocrine tumorPrimary tumor resectionSmall bowel resection

Identifiers

PMID32426095
PMCPMC7215975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.