Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32426040›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2020

Galcanezumab in migraine prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Panagiotis Gklinos, Dimos D Mitsikostas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Migraine and Its Treatment from the Medicinal Chemistry Perspective.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Could erectile dysfunction be a side effect of CGRP inhibition? A case report.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Monoclonal Antibodies as Neurological Therapeutics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiotis GklinosNeurology Department, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-6460
Dimos D MitsikostasFirst Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 74 V. Sofia's Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.
KAT General Hospital of Attica · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGalcanezumab, along with three other monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based treatment for the prophylaxis of migraine. Galcanezumab shares data also for the prophylaxis of cluster headache.

objectiveTo provide a pooled safety and efficacy analysis of all phase III randomized controlled trials of galcanezumab in the preventive therapy of migraine.

methodsA computer-based literature search was conducted on MEDLINE and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry for phase III randomized controlled trials of galcanezumab in migraine prevention. The primary outcome was the mean change in monthly migraine days (MMDs). The proportions of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), at least one serious adverse event (SAE) or withdrew from the study were used as safety outcomes.

resultsTwo trials were included in the efficacy meta-analysis and three in the safety meta-analysis. Migraine preventive treatment with subcutaneous galcanezumab, at both 120 mg and 240 mg dosages, was associated with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number of MMDs

conclusionsGalcanezumab is an efficacious and well-tolerated preventive treatment for migraine. Larger clinical trials with longer follow-up periods need to be conducted in order to provide more safety data of the above-mentioned drug.

Indexed as

CGRPgalcanezumabmeta-analysismigrainemonoclonal antibodiespreventive therapy

Identifiers

PMID32426040
PMCPMC7222235
OpenAlexW3023155968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.