Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425905›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Scott N Dean, Mary Ashley Rimmer, Kendrick B Turner, Daniel A Phillips, Julie C Caruana, William Judson Hervey, Dagmar H Leary, Scott A Walper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical features ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott N DeanNational Research Council Associate, Washington, DC, United States.
Mary Ashley RimmerNational Research Council Associate, Washington, DC, United States.
Kendrick B TurnerUS Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science & Engineering (Code 6900), Washington, DC, United States.
Daniel A PhillipsAmerican Society for Engineering Education Associate, Washington, DC, United States.
Julie C CaruanaAmerican Society for Engineering Education Associate, Washington, DC, United States.
William Judson HerveyUS Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science & Engineering (Code 6900), Washington, DC, United States.
Dagmar H LearyUS Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science & Engineering (Code 6900), Washington, DC, United States.
Scott A WalperUS Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science & Engineering (Code 6900), Washington, DC, United States.
United States Naval Research Laboratory · USAmerican Society For Engineering Education · USNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports have shown that Gram-positive bacteria actively secrete spherical nanometer-sized proteoliposome membrane vesicles (MVs) into their surroundings. Though MVs are implicated in a broad range of biological functions, few studies have been conducted to examine their potential as delivery vehicles of antimicrobials. Here, we investigate the natural ability of

Indexed as

antimicrobialbacteriocinslactic acid bacteriaLactobacillus acidophilusmembrane vesicles

Identifiers

PMID32425905
PMCPMC7203471
OpenAlexW3021919631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.