ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Identifying Drug Targets in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Through Machine Learning, Analyzing Biomolecular Networks, and Structural Modeling.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Computational theranostics strategy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Machine learning-Based integration develops a metastasis-Related rhythmic gene signature for improving outcomes in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven microRNA signature for early detection of gastric cancer: discovery and clinical functional exploration.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- MiR-200/183 family-mediated module biomarker for gastric cancer progression: an AI-assisted bioinformatics method with experimental functional survey.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Elevated ITGA2 expression promotes collagen type I-induced clonogenic growth of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- In Silico Methods for Identification of Potential Active Sites of Therapeutic Targets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- In silico Methods for Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Review
- The Highly Expressed IFIT1 in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Enhances Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells.Molecular biotechnology · 2022Article
- lncRNAs Functioned as ceRNA to Sponge miR-15a-5p Affects the Prognosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Correlates With Tumor Immune Infiltration.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Integrin subunit alpha V is a potent prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in lower-grade glioma.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Anticancer Effect of Heparin-Taurocholate Conjugate on Orthotopically Induced Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Centrality of drug targets in protein networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Identification of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor as Targetable Stratification Factor for Drug Repurposing in Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death and has an extremely poor prognosis. Thus, identifying new disease-associated genes and targets for PDAC diagnosis and therapy is urgently needed. This requires investigations into the underlying molecular mechanisms of PDAC at both the systems and molecular levels. Herein, we developed a computational method of predicting cancer genes and anticancer drug targets that combined three independent expression microarray datasets of PDAC patients and protein-protein interaction data. First, Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination was applied to the gene expression data to rank the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PDAC patients and controls. Then, protein-protein interaction networks were constructed based on the DEGs, and a new score comprising gene expression and network topological information was proposed to identify cancer genes. Finally, these genes were validated by "druggability" prediction, survival and common network analysis, and functional enrichment analysis. Furthermore, two integrins were screened to investigate their structures and dynamics as potential drug targets for PDAC. Collectively, 17 disease genes and some stroma-related pathways including extracellular matrix-receptor interactions were predicted to be potential drug targets and important pathways for treating PDAC. The protein-drug interactions and hinge sites predication of ITGAV and ITGA2 suggest potential drug binding residues in the Thigh domain. These findings provide new possibilities for targeted therapeutic interventions in PDAC, which may have further applications in other cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.