Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425783›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Identifying Drug Targets in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Through Machine Learning, Analyzing Biomolecular Networks, and Structural Modeling.

Wenying Yan, Xingyi Liu, Yibo Wang, Shuqing Han, Fan Wang, Xin Liu, Fei Xiao, Guang Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. In silico Methods for Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenying YanCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xingyi LiuCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yibo WangCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shuqing HanCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Fan WangCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xin LiuCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Fei XiaoCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Guang HuCenter for Systems Biology, Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death and has an extremely poor prognosis. Thus, identifying new disease-associated genes and targets for PDAC diagnosis and therapy is urgently needed. This requires investigations into the underlying molecular mechanisms of PDAC at both the systems and molecular levels. Herein, we developed a computational method of predicting cancer genes and anticancer drug targets that combined three independent expression microarray datasets of PDAC patients and protein-protein interaction data. First, Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination was applied to the gene expression data to rank the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PDAC patients and controls. Then, protein-protein interaction networks were constructed based on the DEGs, and a new score comprising gene expression and network topological information was proposed to identify cancer genes. Finally, these genes were validated by "druggability" prediction, survival and common network analysis, and functional enrichment analysis. Furthermore, two integrins were screened to investigate their structures and dynamics as potential drug targets for PDAC. Collectively, 17 disease genes and some stroma-related pathways including extracellular matrix-receptor interactions were predicted to be potential drug targets and important pathways for treating PDAC. The protein-drug interactions and hinge sites predication of ITGAV and ITGA2 suggest potential drug binding residues in the Thigh domain. These findings provide new possibilities for targeted therapeutic interventions in PDAC, which may have further applications in other cancer types.

Indexed as

drug targetsintegrinspancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprotein-protein interactionsstructural dynamicssupport vector machine–recursive feature elimination

Identifiers

PMID32425783
PMCPMC7204992
OpenAlexW3022943852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.