Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425774›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Evaluation of Subjects Experiencing Allergic Reactions to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Clinical Characteristics and Drugs Involved.

Natalia Pérez-Sánchez, Inmaculada Doña, Gador Bogas, María Salas, Almudena Testera, José A Cornejo-García, María J Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. An Update on Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Urticaria.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Pérez-SánchezAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
Inmaculada DoñaAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
Gador BogasAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
María SalasAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
Almudena TesteraAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
José A Cornejo-GarcíaAllergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, ARADyAL, Malaga, Spain.
María J TorresAllergy Unit, Malaga Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), the most commonly prescribed and consumed medicines worldwide, are the main triggers of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs). The underlying mechanisms of NSAID-DHRs may be related to COX-1 inhibition (cross-hypersensitivity reactions, CRs) or to immunological recognition (selective reactions, SRs), being the latter remarkably less studied. SRs include those usually appearing within the first hour after drug intake (single-NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema or anaphylaxis, SNIUAA), and those usually occurring more than 24 h after (single-NSAID-induced delayed reactions, SNIDR). We have evaluated the largest series of patients with SRs, analyzing the number of episodes and drugs involved, the latency for reaction onset, the clinical entities, among other variables, as well as the value of available diagnostic methods. Globally, pyrazolones and arylpropionics were the most frequent culprits (39.3% and 37.3%, respectively). Pyrazolones were the most frequent triggers in SNIUAA and arylpropionics in SNIDR. Urticaria was the most common clinical entity in SNIUAA (42.4%) followed by anaphylaxis (33.3%); whereas SNIDR induced mostly fixed drug eruption (41.1%) and maculopapular exanthema (32.6%). The percentage of patients diagnosed by clinical history was higher in SNIUAA compared with SNIDR (62.7% versus 35.3%,

Indexed as

anaphylaxisclinical immunologydrug allergynon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsurticarial

Identifiers

PMID32425774
PMCPMC7212440
OpenAlexW3020760726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.