Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2020

Day-to-Day Test-Retest Reliability of EEG Profiles in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development.

April R Levin, Adam J Naples, Aaron Wolfe Scheffler, Sara J Webb, Frederick Shic, Catherine A Sugar, Michael Murias, Raphael A Bernier, Katarzyna Chawarska, Geraldine Dawson and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

April R LevinDepartment of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Adam J NaplesChild Study Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Aaron Wolfe SchefflerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sara J WebbCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Frederick ShicCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Catherine A SugarDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Michael MuriasInstitute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Raphael A BernierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Katarzyna ChawarskaChild Study Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Geraldine DawsonDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Susan FajaLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Shafali JesteDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Charles A NelsonLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
James C McPartlandChild Study Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Damla ŞentürkDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical TrialsU19MH108206 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEBB, SARA JANE · 2015 to 2024
$68.8M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Mouse Neurodevelopmental Behavior CoreU54HD090255 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAHIN, MUSTAFA · 2016 to 2020
$5.2M
A unified longitudinal functional data framework for the analysis of complex biomedical dataR01GM111378 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SENTURK, DAMLA, SUGAR, CATHERINE ANN · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090255NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111378NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH108206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker development is currently a high priority in neurodevelopmental disorder research. For many types of biomarkers (particularly biomarkers of diagnosis), reliability over short periods is critically important. In the field of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), resting electroencephalography (EEG) power spectral densities (PSD) are well-studied for their potential as biomarkers. Classically, such data have been decomposed into pre-specified frequency bands (e.g., delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma). Recent technical advances, such as the Fitting Oscillations and One-Over-F (FOOOF) algorithm, allow for targeted characterization of the features that naturally emerge within an EEG PSD, permitting a more detailed characterization of the frequency band-agnostic shape of each individual's EEG PSD. Here, using two resting EEGs collected a median of 6 days apart from 22 children with ASD and 25 typically developing (TD) controls during the Feasibility Visit of the Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials, we estimate test-retest reliability based on the characterization of the PSD shape in two ways: (1) Using the FOOOF algorithm we estimate six parameters (offset, slope, number of peaks, and amplitude, center frequency and bandwidth of the largest alpha peak) that characterize the shape of the EEG PSD; and (2) using nonparametric functional data analyses, we decompose the shape of the EEG PSD into a reduced set of basis functions that characterize individual power spectrum shapes. We show that individuals exhibit idiosyncratic PSD signatures that are stable over recording sessions using both characterizations. Our data show that EEG activity from a brief 2-min recording provides an efficient window into characterizing brain activity at the single-subject level with desirable psychometric characteristics that persist across different analytical decomposition methods. This is a necessary step towards analytical validation of biomarkers based on the EEG PSD and provides insights into parameters of the PSD that offer short-term reliability (and thus promise as potential biomarkers of trait or diagnosis) vs. those that are more variable over the short term (and thus may index state or other rapidly dynamic measures of brain function). Future research should address the longer-term stability of the PSD, for purposes such as monitoring development or response to treatment.

Indexed as

autismautism spectrum disorderEEGFOOOFpowerreliabilitytest-retest

Identifiers

PMID32425762
PMCPMC7204836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.