Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425607›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Deep Learning in CT Images: Automated Pulmonary Nodule Detection for Subsequent Management Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Yi-Ming Xu, Teng Zhang, Hai Xu, Liang Qi, Wei Zhang, Yu-Dong Zhang, Da-Shan Gao, Mei Yuan, Tong-Fu Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Ming XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Teng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Hai XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Liang QiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Dong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Da-Shan Gao12sigma Technologies, San Diego, California, USA.
Mei YuanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-9198
Tong-Fu YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNSigma Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the detection performance of the 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) models with radiologists of different levels of experience in detecting pulmonary nodules on thin-section computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1109 consecutive patients who underwent follow-up thin-section CT at our institution. The 3D CNN model for nodule detection was re-trained and complemented by expert augmentation. The annotations of a consensus panel consisting of two expert radiologists determined the ground truth. The detection performance of the re-trained CAD model and three other radiologists at different levels of experience were tested using a free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis in the test group.

resultsThe detection performance of the re-trained CAD model was significantly better than that of the pre-trained network (sensitivity: 93.09% vs 38.44%). The re-trained CAD model had a significantly better detection performance than radiologists (average sensitivity: 93.09% vs 50.22%), without significantly increasing the number of false positives per scan (1.64 vs 0.68). In the training set, 922 nodules less than 3 mm in size in 211 patients at high risk were recommended for follow-up CT according to the Fleischner Society Guidelines. Fifteen of 101 solid nodules were confirmed to be lung cancer.

conclusionThe re-trained 3D CNN-based CAD model, complemented by expert augmentation, was an accurate and efficient tool in identifying incidental pulmonary nodules for subsequent management.

Indexed as

computed tomographycomputer-aided detectionconvolutional neural networkpulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID32425607
PMCPMC7196793
OpenAlexW3022267432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.