Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425495›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Topography-Guided Refractive Astigmatism Outcomes: Predictions Comparing Three Different Programming Methods.

R Doyle Stulting, Daniel S Durrie, Richard J Potvin, Steve H Linn, Ronald R Krueger, Mark C Lobanoff, Majid Moshirfar, Manoj V Motwani, Timothy P Lindquist, Karl G Stonecipher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04495829 (Clinical and Refractive Outcomes After Contoura® Refractive Surgery Planned Using Phorcides Surgery Planning Software), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04495829 completednot on this map

Clinical and Refractive Outcomes After Contoura® Refractive Surgery Planned Using Phorcides Surgery Planning Software

TypeobservationalSponsorAmerican Corneal ConsultantsRan2020 to 2021Enrolled70ConditionsRefractive ErrorsArmsPhorcides Analytical Engine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

R Doyle StultingWoolfson Eye Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-1913
Daniel S DurrieDurrieVision, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1301-3241
Richard J PotvinScience in Vision, Akron, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0964-5035
Steve H LinnHoopes, Durrie, Rivera Research, Draper, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7931-4341
Ronald R KruegerCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-4389
Mark C LobanoffNorth Suburban Eye Specialists, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-7532
Majid MoshirfarHoopes, Durrie, Rivera Research, Draper, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-6250
Manoj V MotwaniMotwani LASIK Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8482-2017
Timothy P LindquistDurrieVision, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-5670
Karl G StonecipherTLC Laser Centers, Greensboro, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4050-9357
Durrie Vision · USCleveland Clinic · USHoopes Vision · USKavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology · USTLC Precision Wafer Technology (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · USWoolfson Eye Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the laser programming strategy that will achieve optimal refractive outcomes of LASIK with a topography-guided laser for eyes with a disparity between cylinder measured by manifest refraction and cylinder measured by topography.

settingSix surgeons at 5 clinical sites in the USA.

designRetrospective data review.

methodsPreoperative, treatment, and postoperative data on 52 eyes that underwent topography-guided LASIK with the WaveLight EX500 Contoura

resultsThe poorest calculated theoretical outcomes were obtained with the manifest refraction (centroid: -0.43, 0.22; mean calculated error vector: 0.56 ± 0.42 D; p=ns). Better outcomes were obtained with the topographically measured refraction (centroid: 0.37, 0.02; mean calculated error vector: 0.47 ± 0.33 D; p=ns). The best outcomes were obtained with Phorcides (centroid: -0.15, 0.06; mean calculated error vector: 0.39 ± 0.28 D; p=ns). The mean error vector magnitude in the Phorcides Low group was significantly lower than for the Manifest and Topo Low groups (0.26 D vs 0.48 D and 0.33 D; p<0.01). The mean error magnitude in the Phorcides High group was nearly 0.25 D lower than for the Manifest High group (0.48 D vs 0.70 D; p<0.01), but was the same as for the Topo High group (0.48 D vs 0.48 D).

conclusionOur study suggests that using the topographically measured cylinder or the cylinder selected by Phorcides will produce more desirable refractive outcomes than entry of the preoperative refractive cylinder as the basis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism with the WaveLight Contoura Vision excimer laser.

Indexed as

astigmatismexcimerlaserLASIKPRKtopography

Identifiers

PMID32425495
PMCPMC7190381
OpenAlexW3018406292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.