ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2020
Assessment of Knowledge and Practice of Blood Transfusion Among Nurses in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Adverse Transfusion Reactions Among Nurses, Physicians, and Transfusion Specialists in China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Article
- Blood Transfusion Procedure: Assessment of Serbian Intensive Care Nurses' Knowledge.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Blood Transfusion Knowledge among Nurses in Malaysia: A University Hospital Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Bedside Blood Transfusion - What Nurses Know and Perform: A Cross-Sectional Study from A Tertiary-Level Cancer Hospital in Rural Kerala.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and awareness of blood transfusion practices among nurses working in a tertiary care hospital. The objective was to make use of the results to decide the necessity of targeted teaching using lectures and simulated ward scenes. This was a cross sectional study in which a questionnaire comprising of 25 single best-response type multiple choice questions related to blood products and blood transfusion was distributed to nurses who were selected randomly. Questions were both knowledge and practice based. Five hundred and forty-six nurses consented and were assessed. The data was collected, entered and statistically assessed. The number of 'Correct', 'Incorrect' and 'Don't Know' answers were noted. Each correct answer was awarded 1 point, whereas a wrong answer and a 'Don't Know' answer received no points. The individual scores were noted and then multiplied by 4 to get a percentage value. Nurses with 1-5 years of experience scored statistically better than nurses with < 1 year and > 5 years of experience. Nurses working in the haematology-oncology ward scored the most number of correct responses, followed by nurses working in ICU. Only 9.9% of nurses answered > 80% questions correctly. Nurses who had 1-5 years of experience scored better. All nurses were trained in blood transfusion at induction. Though there were occasional non-compulsory lectures as ongoing programs, they had no specific impact on knowledge and awareness. The authors suggest that targeted and regular simulated training is essential at all levels of nursing experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.