Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425343›Full record

ArticleJournal of toxicologic pathology2020

A histopathological study on spontaneous gastrointestinal epithelial tumors in dogs.

Tsubasa Saito, Kazumi Nibe, James K Chambers, Mizuho Uneyama, Ko Nakashima, Koichi Ohno, Hajime Tsujimoto, Kazuyuki Uchida, Hiroyuki Nakayama

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of toxicologic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma in a tufted deer: differential diagnosis and literature review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tsubasa SaitoLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Kazumi NibeJapan Animal Referral Medical Center, 2-5-8 Kuji, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 213-0032, Japan.
James K ChambersLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Mizuho UneyamaLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Ko NakashimaJapan Small Animal Medical Center, 2-27-4 Nakatomi-minami, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-0003, Japan.
Koichi OhnoLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Hajime TsujimotoLaboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Kazuyuki UchidaLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
Hiroyuki NakayamaLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPASKA Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPJapan Small Animal Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the histopathological features, biological nature, anatomical location, sex, age and breeds of dogs affected by spontaneous gastrointestinal epithelial tumor. Biopsy samples of gastrointestinal tumors, from 95 dogs were examined and classified according to the WHO histological classification. A total of 131 samples, including 38 gastric, 13 small intestinal, and 80 large intestinal tumors were examined. The study observed that Jack Russell Terriers and Miniature Dachshunds were the breeds with the highest predisposition for gastrointestinal tumors. Gastric tumors included 5 adenomas, 30 adenocarcinomas (12 tubular, 2 papillary, 4 tubulopapillary and 12 signet-ring cell carcinomas) and 3 undifferentiated carcinomas. Intestinal tumors included 35 adenomas, 57 adenocarcinomas (43 acinar, 4 papillary, 7 mucinous and 3 signet-ring cell carcinomas), and 1 undifferentiated carcinoma. The study did not detect any difference among the incidence rates of invasion/metastasis in the tubular (44%), papillary (33%) and tubulopapillary (25%) adenocarcinomas. Additionally, the tubular (acinar), papillary and tubulopapillary adenocarcinomas were further divided into 48 polypoid and 17 non-polypoid types, based on their growth patterns. Invasion/metastasis was detected in 21% of the polypoid type and 100% of the non-polypoid type of adenocarcinomas. A correlation was detected between the occurrence of invasion/metastasis and the type of histopathological growth pattern in adenocarcinomas. The study demonstrated that Jack Russell terriers and Miniature Dachshunds are the most common breeds affected by gastrointestinal tumors and the entire group of the canine adenocarcinomas with non-polypoid growth pattern has greater malignant potentials, compared to the adenocarcinomas with polypoid growth patterns.

Indexed as

doggastric tumorhistopathologyintestinal tumorspontaneous epithelial tumor

Identifiers

PMID32425343
PMCPMC7218236
OpenAlexW3002770223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.