ArticleClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2020
A simple remote nutritional screening tool and practical guidance for nutritional care in primary practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional Risk Screening Tools for Older Adults with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Real-time and digital remote nutritional assessment framework with the use of smartphone-enabled facial morphometrics and machine learning- a proof of concept.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Usage of Telehealth and Telenutrition Services by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists: Cross-Sectional Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2025Article
- Nutritional status and nutritional intervention of older inpatients in China.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
- Evolution of the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults: a primer for clinicians.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Risk of Sarcopenia and Associated Factors in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nascent to novel methods to evaluate malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2023Review
- Oncology-Led Early Identification of Nutritional Risk: A Pragmatic, Evidence-Based Protocol (PRONTO).Cancers · 2023Article
- Relationship between the structure, function and endothelial damage, and vascular ageing and the biopsychological situation in adults diagnosed with persistent COVID (BioICOPER study). A research protocol of a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Establishing a machine learning model for predicting nutritional risk through facial feature recognition.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 in nutritional and functional status of survivors admitted in intensive care units during the first outbreak. Preliminary results of the NUTRICOVID study.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Observational
- COVID-19: Lessons on malnutrition, nutritional care and public health from the ESPEN-WHO Europe call for papers.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- Nutritional management of individuals with obesity and COVID-19: ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Article
- A Digital Smartphone-Based Self-administered Tool (R+ Dietitian) for Nutritional Risk Screening and Dietary Assessment in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: Evaluation and Diagnostic Accuracy Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Frequency and factors associated with sarcopenia prediction in adult and elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19.Experimental gerontology · 2022Article
- Review
- Host-related factors and cancer: Malnutrition and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Hematological oncology · 2022Review
- Nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection during rehabilitation.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2022Review
- Observational
- High SARC-F score predicts poor survival of patients with cancer receiving palliative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Challenging periods like the COVID-19 pandemic require fast and efficient adaptations of the healthcare system. It is vital that every patient has access to nutritional care as a part of primary healthcare services, even if social distancing measures are adopted. Therefore, we propose a simple remote nutritional screening tool and practical guidance for nutritional care in primary practice, and their implementation into telemedicine processes and digital platforms suitable for healthcare providers. The acronym for the tool is R-MAPP, as for Remote - Malnutrition APP, while the tool will be available also as an app. This protocol consists of two simple validated clinical tools for identifying nutritional risk and loss of muscle mass and function -Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') and SARC-F (5-item questionnaire: Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs and Falls) - and additional practical guidance on nutritional interventions for family physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.