Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32425010›Full record

ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B2020

Analysis of an improved workflow of endoscope reprocessing for bedside endoscopic diagnosis and treatment on COVID-19 patients

Qing Gu, Hua-Fen Wang, Ying Fang, Ye Lu, Zhe Shen, Yan Wang, Xin Wu, Li Cen, Yi-Shu Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 and the digestive system: A comprehensive review.World journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qing GuCenter of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Hua-Fen WangCenter of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Ying FangCenter of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Ye LuZhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Zhe ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Yan WangCenter of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Xin WuCenter of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Li CenDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Yi-Shu ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang University · CNZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe cases infected with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), named by the World Health Organization (WHO) on Feb. 11, 2020, tend to present a hypercatabolic state because of severe systemic consumption, and are susceptible to stress ulcers and even life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment constitute an irreplaceable part in the handling of severe COVID-19 cases. Endoscopes, as reusable precision instruments with complicated structures, require more techniques than other medical devices in cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, and other reprocessing procedures. From 2016 to 2019, health care-acquired infection caused by improper endoscope reprocessing has always been among the top 5 on the list of top 10 health technology hazards issued by the Emergency Care Research Institute. Considering the highly infective nature of COVID-19 and the potential aerosol contamination therefrom, it is of pivotal significance to ensure that endoscopes are strictly reprocessed between uses. In accordance with the national standard "Regulation for Cleaning and Disinfection Technique of Flexible Endoscope (WS507-2016)," we improved the workflow of endoscope reprocessing including the selection of chemicals in an effort to ensure quality control throughout the clinical management towards COVID-19 patients. Based on the experience we attained from the 12 severe COVID-19 cases in our hospital who underwent endoscopy 23 times in total, the article provides an improved version of endoscopic reprocessing guidelines for bedside endoscopic diagnosis and treatment on COVID-19 patients for reference.

Indexed as

WorkflowAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBetacoronavirusChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionDisinfectionEndoscopesEquipment ContaminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeracetic AcidNovel coronavirus; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV); Disinfection; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; Infection prevention and control

Identifiers

PMID32425010
PMCPMC7210095
OpenAlexW3022699084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.