Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424767›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Negative prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of undifferentiated (anaplastic) carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas: study of 13 cases comparing ductal pancreatic carcinoma and review of the literature.

Jan Hrudka, Kateřina Lawrie, Petr Waldauf, Vanda Ciprová, Jana Moravcová, Radoslav Matěj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan HrudkaDepartment of Pathology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.hrudka@lf3.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-5649-4586
Kateřina LawrieDepartment of General Surgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4668-5837
Vanda CiprováInstitute of Pathology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana MoravcováDepartment of Pathology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radoslav MatějDepartment of Pathology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6152-6343
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky Research Laboratory of Tumor Diseases, CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24509Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky TN64190Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky VFN64165Univerzita Karlova v Praze PROGRES Q28 Oncology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic carcinoma remains one of the leading cancer-related causes of death worldwide and is generally characterized by a dismal prognosis and limited potential for oncologic treatment. A rare subvariant of pancreatic cancer, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC), has an unpredictable prognosis according to many previous studies, with unexpectedly long survival in individual cases. In this study, we collected, retrospectively, 13 cases of well-documented UCOGCs and performed immunohistochemistry focused on the expression of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and several other potential therapeutic and predictive markers (PanTRK, p53, MSH2, PMS2, and the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes), to explore their correlation with the follow-up of the patients. As a control group, we examined 24 cases of conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In our results, PanTRK was negative in all 24 cases. P53 did not show any significant differences between UCOGCs and PDACs, and the entire cohort was MSH2, MLH1, PMS2, and MSH6 positive. Significant differences were present in the analysis of PD-L1: UCOGCs were found to express PD-L1 significantly more frequently and have a higher number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes than PDAC. The expression of PD-L1 was related to significantly shorter survival in patients with UCOGC and in the entire cohort. Patients with PD-L1 negative UCOGCs displayed surprisingly long survival in comparison to PD-L1 positive UCOGCs and PDACs (both PD-L1+ and PD-L1-). We compared our results with previously published data, and, after statistical analysis, we were able to identify PD-L1 as an effective prognostic marker of UCOGC and suggest a strong need for a clinical trial of immune checkpoint immunotherapy in patients with advanced PD-L1 positive UCOGC.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdultAgedB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleGiant CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMiddle AgedOsteoclastsPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanCarcinomaImmunotherapyOsteoclast giant cellPancreasPD-L1Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID32424767
OpenAlexW3026361657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.