Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424645›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Preventing emergency department visits among patients with cancer: a scoping review.

Scott W Kirkland, Miriam Garrido-Clua, Daniela R Junqueira, Sandra Campbell, Brian H Rowe

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From metrics to practice: identifying preventable emergency department visits for patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott W KirklandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1G1.43 WMC 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-0999
Miriam Garrido-CluaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1G1.43 WMC 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Daniela R JunqueiraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1G1.43 WMC 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Sandra CampbellJ.W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, 2K3.28 Walter C. Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada.
Brian H RoweDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1G1.43 WMC 8440-112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada. brian.rowe@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Alberta Health Services NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this scoping review was to examine the effectiveness of supportive care interventions designed to reduce ED visits among patients receiving active cancer treatment.

methodsLiterature search involving nine electronic databases and grey literature. Inclusion criteria considered studies assessing the impact of any intervention to reduce ED utilization among patients with active cancer. Dichotomous and continuous outcomes were summarized as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model, wherever appropriate.

resultsA total of 25 studies were included. Interventions identified in these studies comprised the following: routine and symptom-based patient follow-up, oncology outpatient clinics, early symptom detection, comprehensive inpatient management, hospital at home, and patient navigators. Six out of eight studies assessing oncology outpatient clinics reported a decrease in the proportion of patients presenting to the ED. A meta-analysis of three of these studies did not demonstrate reduction in ED utilization (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.08; I

conclusionA variety of supportive care interventions designed to mitigate ED presentations by patients receiving active cancer treatment have been developed and evaluated. Limited evidence suggests that an oncology outpatient clinic may be an effective strategy to reduce ED utilization; however, additional high-quality studies are needed.

Indexed as

CancerEmergency departmentMeta-analysisOvercrowdingScoping review

Identifiers

PMID32424645
OpenAlexW3028181961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.