Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424644›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Experiences and unmet needs of family members requested to donate haematopoietic stem cells to an ill relative: findings from a prospective multi-centre study.

Nienke Zomerdijk, Jane Turner, Geoffrey R Hill, David Gottlieb

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Supportive Care of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors.Clinical hematology international · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nienke ZomerdijkFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. nienke.zomerdijk@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5008-6429
Jane TurnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-217X
Geoffrey R HillFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-0429
David GottliebBlood and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-1766
The University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation Diamond Care GrantRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation Postgraduate ScholarshipThe Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite well-documented physical effects of haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation, far less attention has been focused on the psychosocial impact for family donors. This study aimed to better understand the psychosocial aspects of HSC donation by family members, focusing, in particular on their needs for information and supportive care.

methodsThirty-one adult HSC family donors from two clinical hospitals were interviewed before, during and 1 month after HSC donation. Interviews explored ambivalence, motivation, perceived pressure, preparedness, the donor-recipient relationship, information and support received and suggestions for improvement.

resultsThree main themes about the donation experience were identified: 'call to arms' (focused on the recipient, stressful urgency, making meaning of being a donor, decisional ambivalence), 'proceeding with donation' (living in limbo, unsettling uncertainty, pervasive pain, feeling supported) and 'after the dust settles' (feeling discarded, downplaying role, residual symptoms, dealing with adverse recipient outcomes). Underlying system and communication issues included time for consideration prior to donor work-up, management of confidentiality, information inadequacy and access to support. Donors wanted information about the emotional challenges specific to being a family donor, such as ways in which previous donors coped with recipient death. For donors whose recipient had died, the priority for improved care was follow-up support.

conclusionOur findings emphasise a gap in information and supportive care for family donors and the need for a protocol specifically designed to inform and support family donors before, during and after HSC donation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultEmotionsFamilyFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMotivationProspective StudiesTissue DonorsUncertaintyFamily donorsHaematopoietic stem cell transplantInformationPsycho-oncologySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID32424644
OpenAlexW3026395050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.