ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2020
Congenital CMV-Coded Diagnosis Among American Indian and Alaska Native Infants in the United States, 2000-2017.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The validity of ICD-based codes to identify pediatric cases of congenital cytomegalovirus.Current medical research and opinion · 2025Article
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnoses and Congenital Cytomegalovirus.Pediatrics · 2024Article
- Inconsistent Provider Testing Practices for Congenital Cytomegalovirus: Missed Diagnoses and Missed Opportunities.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Identification of congenital CMV cases in administrative databases and implications for monitoring prevalence, healthcare utilization, and costs.Current medical research and opinion · 2021Article
- Updated National and State-Specific Prevalence of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection, United States, 2018-2022.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To assess prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV)-coded diagnosis among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) infants who received Indian Health Service (IHS)-funded care during 2000-2017. Using data from the Indian Health Service National Data Warehouse, we identified AI/AN infants with congenital CMV-coded diagnosis, defined as presence of a diagnostic code for congenital CMV disease or CMV infection (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification 771.1, 078.5, P35.1, B25.xx) within 90 days of life. We calculated prevalence of congenital CMV-coded diagnosis overall, by age at first CMV-coded diagnosis, and by geographical region. During 2000-2017, 54 (1.5/10,000) of 354,923 AI/AN infants had a congenital CMV-coded diagnosis; 32 (0.9/10,000) had their first CMV-coded diagnosis within 45 days of life, and 22 (0.6/10,000) between 46 and 90 days of life. Prevalence of congenital CMV-coded diagnosis varied by region (range 0.9/10,000 in Southern Plains to 3.7/10,000 in Alaska, P = 0.0038). Among the 54 infants with a congenital CMV-coded diagnosis, 48% had clinical signs such as jaundice, petechiae, or microcephaly, compared to 25% of 354,869 infants without a CMV-coded diagnosis (P < 0.01); and 1 (2%) vs. 277 (0.1%), respectively, died (P < 0.05). The prevalence of congenital CMV-coded diagnosis among AI/AN infants who received care at IHS facilities was slightly lower than in other studies based on health claims data and varied by geographical region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.