Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424607›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2020

Cloacal Gram-Negative Microbiota in Free-Living Grass Snake Natrix natrix from Poland.

Aleksandra Pawlak, Katarzyna Morka, Stanisław Bury, Zuzanna Antoniewicz, Anna Wzorek, Gabriela Cieniuch, Agnieszka Korzeniowska-Kowal, Mariusz Cichoń, Gabriela Bugla-Płoskońska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Zoonotic potential and prevalence ofInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra PawlakDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Wrocław, Stanisława Przybyszewskiego 63-77, 51-148, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna MorkaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Wrocław, Stanisława Przybyszewskiego 63-77, 51-148, Wrocław, Poland.
Stanisław BuryInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland.
Zuzanna AntoniewiczDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Wrocław, Stanisława Przybyszewskiego 63-77, 51-148, Wrocław, Poland.
Anna WzorekDepartment of Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Weigla 12, 53-114, Wrocław, Poland.
Gabriela CieniuchDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Wrocław, Stanisława Przybyszewskiego 63-77, 51-148, Wrocław, Poland.
Agnieszka Korzeniowska-KowalDepartment of Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Weigla 12, 53-114, Wrocław, Poland.
Mariusz CichońInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland.
Gabriela Bugla-PłoskońskaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Wrocław, Stanisława Przybyszewskiego 63-77, 51-148, Wrocław, Poland. gabriela.bugla-ploskonska@uwr.edu.pl.
University of Wrocław · PLJagiellonian University · PLLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

Narodowym Centrum Nauki UMO-2016/21/N/NZ8/00959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reptiles appear to be an important vector for Gram-negative pathogens, therefore, they are epidemiologically relevant. However, the composition of reptilian microbiota has been poorly recognized so far. The majority of studies concern exotic reptiles as asymptomatic carriers of Salmonella serovars. Studies of other intestinal bacteria of reptiles are rare. Only recently, the microbiota of free-living European reptiles have been investigated, however, on the basis of small samples, mainly in protected areas. Here, we aim to investigate cloacal Gram-negative microbiota of free-living Natrix natrix. Snakes (N = 45) used in the study were collected in Kraków (Poland) and its vicinity. Nineteen species of Gram-negative bacteria were isolated. The most common species were: Aeromonas hydrophila, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, Salmonella spp. The bacteria prevalent in N. natrix cloacal swabs are likely to represent the natural intestinal Gram-negative microbiota of the examined snakes. Importantly, the identified bacteria are pathogenic to humans, which clearly highlights the epidemiological potential of free-living N. natrix. The risk of infection is high for immunocompromised humans, children (under 5 years old), elderly persons, and pregnant women. Our study provides the largest dataset on intestinal Gram-negative microbiota of wild snakes. The presence of multiple human pathogens determined by us calls for the necessity of further studies on reptile-transmitted bacteria in anthropogenic environments.

Indexed as

ColubridaeMicrobiotaAgedAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPolandPregnancySalmonella

Identifiers

PMID32424607
PMCPMC7415037
OpenAlexW3026896698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.