ArticleClinical oral investigations2020
DNA double-strand breaks of human peripheral blood lymphocyte induced by CT examination of oral and maxillofacial region.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Radiation Effects of Iodinated Contrast Media in Pediatric CT Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Variation in tube voltage for pediatric neck 64VCT: Effect on radiation dose and image quality.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore whether a computed tomography (CT) examination of the head and neck region induces biological damage and whether the damage was correlated with the radiation dose. MATERIALS AND
methodsPeripheral blood was taken from 33 individuals who received head and neck CT examinations. Blood samples were divided into three groups: the control group and the in vivo and in vitro irradiation groups. The number of DNA double-strand breaks was estimated by comparing the changes in the rates of γ-H2AX foci formation in the peripheral blood before and after CT examination. The absorbed dose and effective dose were calculated with the software VirtualDose based on the Monte Carlo method, and the absorbed doses in blood were estimated accordingly.
resultsThe γ-H2AX foci rates were increased in the in vivo (p < 0.001) and in vitro irradiation groups (p < 0.001) after CT examination when compared with those in the control group. The rate of γ-H2AX foci formation showed linear dose-responses for the CT dose index volume (CTDI
conclusionsA CT examination of the head and neck region provides a high enough radiation dose to induce DNA double-strand breaks in cells in the peripheral blood. There was a linear correlation between the formation of DNA double-strand breaks and radiation doses after CT examination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In addition to ensuring image quality, in a real clinical situation, the scanning area should be strictly administered, and repeated operations should be avoided to minimise the patient's radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32424460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.