Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424327›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2020

Coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) and colonization of ocular tissues and secretions: a systematic review.

Francesco Aiello, Gabriele Gallo Afflitto, Raffaele Mancino, Ji-Peng Olivia Li, Massimo Cesareo, Clarissa Giannini, Carlo Nucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. COVID 19 repercussions in ophthalmology: a narrative review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human Organoids as a Promising Platform for Fighting COVID-19.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco AielloOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. francescoaiello@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-1807
Gabriele Gallo AfflittoOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0013-6189
Raffaele MancinoOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Ji-Peng Olivia LiMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Massimo CesareoOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Clarissa GianniniOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Carlo NucciOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has been described to potentially be complicated by ocular involvement. However, scant information is available regarding severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and ocular structures tropism. We conducted a systematic review of articles referenced in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR) from December 20, 2019 to April 6, 2020, providing information on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal sac, and tears. We excluded ongoing clinical  studies as for unobtainable conclusive results. Of 2422 articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria for analysis and were included in the study. None of the studies were multinational. Among the 11 selected papers there were three original articles, one review, four letters, two editorials, and one correspondence letter. Globally, 252 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were included in our review. The prevalence of ocular conjunctivitis complicating the course of COVID-19 was demonstrated to be as high as 32% in one study only. Globally, three patients had conjunctivitis with a positive tear-PCR, 8 patients had positive tear-PCR in the absence of conjunctivitis, and 14 had conjunctivitis with negative tear-PCR. The majority of the available data regarding SARS-CoV-2 colonization of ocular and periocular tissues and secretions have to be considered controversial. However, it cannot be excluded that SARS-CoV-2 could both infect the eye and the surrounding structures. SARS-CoV-2 may use ocular structure as an additional transmission route, as demonstrated by the COVID-19 patients' conjunctival secretion and tears positivity to reverse transcriptase-PCR SARS-CoV-2-RNA assay.

Indexed as

PandemicsPneumonia, ViralBetacoronavirusConjunctivaConjunctivitis, ViralCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Eye DiseasesHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32424327
PMCPMC7232062
OpenAlexW3025207064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.