Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424176›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Genetic, structural, and functional characterization of POLE polymerase proofreading variants allows cancer risk prediction.

Nadim Hamzaoui, Flora Alarcon, Nicolas Leulliot, Rosine Guimbaud, Bruno Buecher, Chrystelle Colas, Carole Corsini, Gregory Nuel, Benoît Terris, Pierre Laurent-Puig and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Case of Polymerase Proofreading-Associated Polyposis: Challenges in Genetic Diagnosis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Somatic Tumor Profile Analysis in a Patient with GermlineJournal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Nadim HamzaouiService de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaires, Hôpital Cochin, APHP Centre Université de Paris and Inserm UMR_S1016, Institut Cochin, Université de Paris, Paris, France. nadim.hamzaoui@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-9401
Flora AlarconMathématiques appliquées Paris 5 (MAP5) CNRS: UMR8145, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nicolas LeulliotLaboratoire de Cristallographie et RMN Biologiques, UMR CNRS 8015, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Pharmacie de Paris, Paris, France.
Rosine GuimbaudUnité d'oncogénétique, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Bruno BuecherDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Chrystelle ColasDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Carole CorsiniMedical Genetics Department, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.
Gregory NuelInstitute of Mathematics, National Center for French Research, Laboratory of Probability, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Benoît TerrisDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre Laurent-PuigDepartment of Biochemistry, Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Stanislas ChaussadeDepartment of gastroenterology, Cochin hospital, assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes university, Paris, France.
Marion DhoogeDepartment of gastroenterology, Cochin hospital, assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes university, Paris, France.
Clément MadruLaboratoire de Cristallographie et RMN Biologiques, UMR CNRS 8015, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Pharmacie de Paris, Paris, France.
Eric ClauserService de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaires, Hôpital Cochin, APHP Centre Université de Paris and Inserm UMR_S1016, Institut Cochin, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRConseil Régional du Languedoc-Roussillon · FRHôpital Cochin · FRInserm · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePolymerase proofreading-associated polyposis is a dominantly inherited colorectal cancer syndrome caused by exonuclease domain missense variants in the DNA polymerases POLE and POLD1. Manifestations may also include malignancies at extracolonic sites. Cancer risks in this syndrome are not yet accurately quantified.

methodsWe sequenced POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domains in 354 individuals with early/familial colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomatous polyposis. We assessed the pathogenicity of POLE variants with yeast fluctuation assays and structural modeling. We estimated the penetrance function for each cancer site in variant carriers with a previously published nonparametric method based on survival analysis approach, able to manage unknown genotypes.

resultsPathogenic POLE exonuclease domain variants P286L, M294R, P324L, N363K, D368N, L424V, K425R, and P436S were found in ten families. The estimated cumulative risk of CRC at 30, 50, and 70 years was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2-17.5), 48.5% (33.2-60.3), and 74% (51.6-86.1). Cumulative risk of glioblastoma was 18.7% (3.2-25.8) at 70 years. Variants interfering with DNA binding (P286L and N363K) had a significantly higher mutagenic effect than variants disrupting ion metal coordination at the exonuclease site.

conclusionThe risk estimates derived from this study provide a rational basis on which to provide genetic counseling to POLE variant carriers.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiColorectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedDNA Polymerase IIGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteinscolorectal cancerglioblastomapenetrancePOLEpolymerase proofreading-associated polyposis

Identifiers

PMID32424176
OpenAlexW3024591649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.