Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424107›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Split-TurboID enables contact-dependent proximity labeling in cells.

Kelvin F Cho, Tess C Branon, Sanjana Rajeev, Tanya Svinkina, Namrata D Udeshi, Themis Thoudam, Chulhwan Kwak, Hyun-Woo Rhee, In-Kyu Lee, Steven A Carr and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. RAN Translation-Coupled Decay of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kelvin F ChoCancer Biology Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Tess C BranonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Sanjana RajeevDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Tanya SvinkinaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Namrata D UdeshiBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Themis ThoudamResearch Institute of Aging and Metabolism, Kyungpook National University, 37224 Daegu, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3845-2964
Chulhwan KwakDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, 08826 Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun-Woo RheeDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, 08826 Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-3455
In-Kyu LeeResearch Institute of Aging and Metabolism, Kyungpook National University, 37224 Daegu, South Korea.
Steven A CarrBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Alice Y TingDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; ayting@stanford.edu.

Funding

Leveraging innovative technologies in basic and clinical cancer researchT32CA009302 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAURA D ATTARDI, Aaron M Newman · 1985 to 2026
$19.1M
Mapping protein communication between organs in homeostasis and diseaseR01DK121409 · NIDDK · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CARR, STEVEN A, MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2018 to 2022
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009302NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximity labeling catalyzed by promiscuous enzymes, such as TurboID, have enabled the proteomic analysis of subcellular regions difficult or impossible to access by conventional fractionation-based approaches. Yet some cellular regions, such as organelle contact sites, remain out of reach for current PL methods. To address this limitation, we split the enzyme TurboID into two inactive fragments that recombine when driven together by a protein-protein interaction or membrane-membrane apposition. At endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites, reconstituted TurboID catalyzed spatially restricted biotinylation, enabling the enrichment and identification of >100 endogenous proteins, including many not previously linked to endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contacts. We validated eight candidates by biochemical fractionation and overexpression imaging. Overall, split-TurboID is a versatile tool for conditional and spatially specific proximity labeling in cells.

Indexed as

BiotinylationEndoplasmic ReticulumHEK293 CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsMitochondriaMitochondrial MembranesProteomeStaining and LabelingMembrane ProteinsProteomeER–mitochondria contactsproximity labelingsplit-TurboID

Identifiers

PMID32424107
PMCPMC7275672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.