Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32424045›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations: a qualitative evaluation.

Rhiannon Phillips, Helen Stanton, Amina Singh-Mehta, David Gillespie, Janine Bates, Micaela Gal, Emma Thomas-Jones, Rachel Lowe, Kerenza Hood, Carl Llor and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Rapid microbiological respiratory point-of-care testing: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementing antibiotic stewardship in high-prescribing English general practices: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rhiannon PhillipsCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Helen StantonCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Amina Singh-MehtaResearch and Innovation Services, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
David GillespieCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Janine BatesCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Micaela GalResearch and Innovation Services, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Emma Thomas-JonesCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rachel LoweCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kerenza HoodCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Carl LlorUniversity Institute in Primary Care Research Jordi Gol, Via Roma Health Centre, Barcelona, Spain.
Hasse MelbyeGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UIT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jochen CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Patrick WhitePopulation Health and Environment Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nick FrancisSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Cardiff University · GBCardiff Metropolitan University · GBInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are prescribed to >70% of patients presenting in primary care with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The PACE randomised controlled trial found that a C-reactive protein point-of-care test (CRP-POCT) management strategy for AECOPD in primary care resulted in a 20% reduction in patient-reported antibiotic consumption over 4 weeks.

aimTo understand perceptions of the value of CRP-POCT for guiding antibiotic prescribing for AECOPD; explore possible mechanisms, mediators, and pathways to effects; and identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation from the perspectives of patients and clinicians. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative process evaluation in UK general practices.

methodSemi-structured telephone interviews with 20 patients presenting with an AECOPD and 20 primary care staff, purposively sampled from the PACE study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework analysis.

resultsPatients and clinicians felt that CRP-POCT was useful in guiding clinicians' antibiotic prescribing decisions for AECOPD, and were positive about introduction of the test in routine care. The CRP-POCT enhanced clinician confidence in antibiotic prescribing decisions, reduced decisional ambiguity, and facilitated communication with patients. Some clinicians thought the CRP-POCT should be routinely used in consultations for AECOPD; others favoured use only when there was decisional uncertainty. CRP-POCT cartridge preparation time and cost were potential barriers to implementation.

conclusionCRP-POCT-guided antibiotic prescribing for AECOPD had high acceptability, but commissioning arrangements and further simplification of the CRP-POCT need attention to facilitate implementation in routine practice.

Indexed as

General PracticePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinHumansPoint-of-Care TestingAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Proteinantibioticchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseC-reactive proteinpoint-of-care systemsprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID32424045
PMCPMC7239040
OpenAlexW3002477150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.