Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32423947›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2020

Emerging views of genome organization in Archaea.

Naomichi Takemata, Stephen D Bell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chromatin and gene regulation in archaea.Molecular microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. How Do Thermophiles Organize Their Genomes?Microbes and environments · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Form and function of archaeal genomes.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Article
  12. The cell biology of archaea.Nature microbiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Archaeal transcription.Transcription · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naomichi TakemataBiology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1902-3766
Stephen D BellBiology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA stedbell@indiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-6592

Funding

Chromosome Archae-tecture: Conserved principles of chromosome organizationR01GM135178 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, STEPHEN DAVID · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
Initiation of DNA ReplicationR01GM125579 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, STEPHEN DAVID · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125579NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, advances in methodologies for the determination of chromosome conformation have provided remarkable insight into the local and higher-order organization of bacterial and eukaryotic chromosomes. Locally folded domains are found in both bacterial and eukaryotic genomes, although they vary in size. Importantly, genomes of metazoans also possess higher-order organization into A- and B-type compartments, regions of transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin, respectively. Until recently, nothing was known about the organization of genomes of organisms in the third domain of life - the archaea. However, despite archaea possessing simple circular genomes that are morphologically reminiscent of those seen in many bacteria, a recent study of archaea of the genus

Indexed as

ArchaeaChromatinChromosomesEukaryotaGenomeChromatinArchaeaChromatinChromosome architectureHi-CSulfolobus

Identifiers

PMID32423947
PMCPMC7325442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.