ArticleInfection and immunity2020
Article in Infection and immunity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNF213-dependent lytic destruction ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Obligate intracellular bacteria and host cell death pathways-the matter of life and death.Cell and tissue research · 2025Review
- UnveilingiScience · 2025Article
- Role of Inflammatory Markers as a Risk Factor for Community-Acquired Pneumonia Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- From coughs to complications: the story ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Review
- Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Insights into innate immune cell evasion byFrontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Psittacosis: An Underappreciated and Often Undiagnosed Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- TargeTron Inactivation of Chlamydia trachomatisInfection and immunity · 2023Article
- Host cell death during infection with Chlamydia: a double-edged sword.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.