Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32423837›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology oncology2020

Pembrolizumab as First-line Therapy in Cisplatin-ineligible Advanced Urothelial Cancer (KEYNOTE-052): Outcomes in Older Patients by Age and Performance Status.

Petros Grivas, Elizabeth R Plimack, Arjun V Balar, Daniel Castellano, Peter H O'Donnell, Joaquim Bellmunt, Thomas Powles, Noah M Hahn, Ronald de Wit, Dean F Bajorin and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02335424 (A Phase II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02335424 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Subjects With Advanced/Unresectable or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2022Enrolled374ConditionsUrothelial CancerArmspembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A New Standard of Care for Bladder Cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Petros GrivasUniversity of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: pgrivas@uw.edu.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arjun V BalarPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel CastellanoHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Peter H O'DonnellThe University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joaquim BellmuntBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Noah M HahnJohns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ronald de WitErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dean F BajorinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Misoo C EllisonMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Tara L FrenklMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
James L GodwinMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Jacqueline VukyOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLFox Chase Cancer Center · USHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with treatment-naive advanced urothelial cancer (UC) ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy are typically older and have comorbidities, representing a difficult-to-treat population.

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of first-line pembrolizumab in subgroups of cisplatin-ineligible older patients (aged ≥65 and ≥75 yr) with advanced UC in KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424), including those with poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 2 [ECOG PS2]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPatients were cisplatin ineligible, had treatment-naive, histologically/cytologically confirmed, locally advanced/metastatic UC with measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 [RECIST v1.1]), and had ECOG PS0-2. Patient subgroups analyzed were aged ≥65yr (n = 302), ≥75 yr (n = 179), ≥65yr with ECOG PS2 (≥65yr+ECOG PS2; n = 119), and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 (n = 78).

interventionAll patients received pembrolizumab 200mg intravenously every 3 wk until confirmed progression, intolerable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or 24 mo of therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1. The key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: ORRs for the ≥65yr, ≥75 yr, ≥65yr+ECOG PS2, and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups were 29%, 27%, 29%, and 31%, respectively; rates of complete and partial responses were similar across subgroups (9%, 5%, 6%, and 6%, and 20%, 22%, 23%, and 24%, respectively). Median DOR and OS were also consistent across the ≥65yr and ≥65yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups and the ≥75 yr and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups. Study limitations included open-label design, lack of a comparator group, and nature of post hoc exploratory analysis.

conclusionsThe clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in advanced UC appeared to be consistent regardless of age and/or poor performance status. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study looked at whether older age and poorer performance status affect how well patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial cancer ineligible for standard-of-care treatment respond to pembrolizumab. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were not affected by older age or poorer performance status, making it an effective option.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Transitional CellCisplatinFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeUrologic NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCisplatinpembrolizumabAgedBladder cancerCheckpoint inhibitorCisplatin ineligibleImmunotherapyPembrolizumabPlatinum ineligiblePoor performance statusProgrammed death 1Urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32423837
PMCPMC8246631
OpenAlexW3024605787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.