ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020
Asymmetric in-plane shear behavior of isolated cadaveric lumbar facet capsular ligaments: Implications for subject specific biomechanical models.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Lumbar Facet Capsular Ligament Becomes More Anisotropic and the Fibers Become Stiffer With Intervertebral Disc and Facet Joint Degeneration.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- In Situ Lumbar Facet Capsular Ligament Strains Due to Joint Pressure and Residual Strain.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Article
- Through-thickness regional variation in the mechanical characteristics of the lumbar facet capsular ligament.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The facet capsular ligaments (FCLs) flank the spinous process on the posterior aspect of the spine. The lumbar FCL is collagenous, with collagen fibers aligned primarily bone-to-bone (medial-lateral) and experiences significant shear, especially during spinal flexion and extension. We characterized the mechanical response of the lumbar FCL to in-plane shear, and we evaluated that response in the context of the fiber architecture. In-plane shear tests with both positive and negative shear (i.e., corresponding to flexion and to extension) were performed on eight cadaveric human L4-L5 FCLs. Our most striking observation was subject-dependent asymmetry in the response. All samples showed a toe region of low stiffness, transitioning to greater stiffness at higher strains, for both shear directions. Different samples showed profoundly different transition strains, with some samples stiffening more rapidly in positive shear and some in negative shear. This unpredictable asymmetry, which did not correlate with age, side, or degeneration state, suggesting that collagen fibers in the FCL are sometimes aligned at a slight positive angle from the bone-to-bone axis and sometimes at a negative angle. Fitting the experimental data to a fiber-composite-based finite element model supported this idea, yielding optimal fits with positive or negative off-axis fiber directions (-40° to +40°). Subsequent examination of selected FCLs by small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) showed a similar variability in fiber direction. We conclude that small individual differences in lumbar FCL architecture may have a significant effect on lumbar FCL mechanics, especially at moderate strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.