Trial reportBMC cancer2020
Early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: use of a cell-loss metric based on serum thymidine kinase 1 and tumour volume.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- TK1 in gastric cancer: Helicobacter pylori-driven oncogenesis biomarker, utility, and emerging targeted therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Thymidine kinase 1 concentration and activity in metastatic breast cancer under CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expression Profile of Thymidine Kinase Genes in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Confirmed by Various Detection Methods.World journal of oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Prediction of Overall Survival by Thymidine Kinase 1 Combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men with Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Is serum thymidine kinase 1 a prognostic biomarker in primary tumor location of colorectal carcinomas?Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical Value on Combined Detection of Serum CA724, DKK1, and TK1 in Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Application Value of Serum TK1 and PCDGF, CYFRA21-1, NSE, and CEA plus Enhanced CT Scan in the Diagnosis of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer and Chemotherapy Monitoring.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Thymidine kinase 1 through the ages: a comprehensive review.Cell & bioscience · 2020Review
- STK1p as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma, based on real-world data.Future science OA · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer pathologic complete response (pCR) indicates a favorable prognosis. Among non-selected patients, pCR is, however, achieved in only 10-30%. Early evaluation of tumour response to treatment would facilitate individualized therapy, with ineffective chemotherapy interrupted or changed. The methodology for this purpose is still limited. Tumour imaging and analysis of macromolecules, released from disrupted tumour cells, are principal alternatives.
objectiveTo investigate whether a metric of cell-loss, defined as the ratio between serum concentration of thymidine kinase1 (sTK1, ng x ml
methodsOne hunred four women with localized breast cancer received neoadjuvant epirubicin/docetaxel in 6 cycles, supplemented with bevacizumab in cycles 3-6. The cell-loss metric was established at baseline (n = 104), 48 h after cycle 2 (n = 104) and prior to cycle 2 (n = 57). The performance of the metric was evaluated by association with pathologic tumour response at surgery 4 months later.
resultsTreatment caused a rise in sTK1, a reduction in tumour volume and a marked increase in the cell-loss metric. Patients were subdivided into quartiles according to the baseline cell-loss metric. For these groups, baseline means were 0.0016, 0.0042, 0.0062, 0.0178 units. After subtraction of baselines, means for the quartiles 48 h after treatment 2 were 0.002, 0.011, 0.030 and 0.357 units. pCR was achieved in 24/104, their distribution in the quartiles (11, 11, 23 and 46%) differed significantly (p = 0.01). In 80 patients with remaining tumour, tumour size was inversely related to the metric (p = 0.002). In 57 patients studied before treatment 2, positive and negative predictive values of the metric were 77.8 and 83.3%, compared to 40.5 and 88.7% 48 h after treatment 2.
conclusionA cell-loss metric, based on serum levels of TK1, released from disrupted tumour cells, and tumour volume, reveal tumour response early during neoadjuvant treatment. The metric reflect tumour properties that differ greatly between patients and determine the sensitivity to cytotoxic treatment. The findings point to the significance of cell loss for tumour growth rate. The metric should be considered in personalized oncology and in the evaluation of new therapeutic modalities.
trial registrationPROMIX (Clinical Trials.govNCT000957125).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.