Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32423280›Full record

ArticleVirulence2020

Insights into idarubicin antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant

Pengfei She, Shijia Li, Linying Zhou, Zhen Luo, Jinfeng Liao, Lanlan Xu, Xianghai Zeng, Ti Chen, Yaqian Liu, Yong Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virulence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug Repurposing: An Emerging Strategy inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inhibitory effects of simeprevir onZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pengfei SheDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Shijia LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Linying ZhouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Zhen LuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Jinfeng LiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Lanlan XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Xianghai ZengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Ti ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Yaqian LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Yong WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University , Changsha, R.P. China.
Third Xiangya Hospital · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRSA is a major concern in community settings and in health care. The emergence of biofilms and persister cells substantially increases its antimicrobial resistance. It is very urgent to develop new antimicrobials to solve this problem.

objectiveIdarubicin was profiled to assess its antimicrobial effects

methodsWe investigated the antimicrobial effects of idarubicin against MRSA by time-kill analysis. The antibiofilm efficacy of idarubicin was assessed by crystal violet and XTT staining, followed by laser confocal microscopy observation. The mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial effects were studied by transmission electron microscopy, all-atom molecular dynamic simulations, SYTOX staining, surface plasma resonance, and DNA gyrase inhibition assay. Further, we addressed the antimicrobial efficacy in wound and subcutaneous abscess infection

resultsIdarubicin kills MRSA cells by disrupting the lipid bilayers and interrupting the DNA topoisomerase IIA subunits, and idarubicin shows synergistic antimicrobial effects with fosfomycin. Through synergy with a single dose treatment fosfomycin and the addition of the cell protector amifostine, the cytotoxicity and cardiotoxicity of idarubicin were significantly reduced without affecting its antimicrobial effects. Idarubicin alone or in combination with fosfomycin exhibited considerable efficacy in a subcutaneous abscess mouse model of MRSA infection. In addition, idarubicin also showed a low probability of causing resistance and good postantibiotic effects.

conclusionsIdarubicin and its analogs have the potential to become a new class of antimicrobials for the treatment of MRSA-related infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsDrug RepositioningDrug SynergismFemaleFosfomycinIdarubicinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Dynamics SimulationSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinIdarubicincell membraneDrug repurposingidarubicinmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusskin and soft tissue infectionstopoisomerase II

Identifiers

PMID32423280
PMCPMC7549941
OpenAlexW3024230992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.