Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32423133›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

EEG Headset Evaluation for Detection of Single-Trial Movement Intention for Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Mads Jochumsen, Hendrik Knoche, Troels Wesenberg Kjaer, Birthe Dinesen, Preben Kidmose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mads JochumsenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-4359
Hendrik KnocheDepartment of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3950-8453
Troels Wesenberg KjaerDepartment of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birthe DinesenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Preben KidmoseDepartment of Engineering-Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

Velux Fonden 22357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in neurorehabilitation; however, the literature about transferring the technology to rehabilitation clinics is limited. A key component of a BCI is the headset, for which several options are available. The aim of this study was to test four commercially available headsets' ability to record and classify movement intentions (movement-related cortical potentials-MRCPs). Twelve healthy participants performed 100 movements, while continuous EEG was recorded from the headsets on two different days to establish the reliability of the measures: classification accuracies of single-trials, number of rejected epochs, and signal-to-noise ratio. MRCPs could be recorded with the headsets covering the motor cortex, and they obtained the best classification accuracies (73%-77%). The reliability was moderate to good for the best headset (a gel-based headset covering the motor cortex). The results demonstrate that, among the evaluated headsets, reliable recordings of MRCPs require channels located close to the motor cortex and potentially a gel-based headset.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyIntentionMovementHumansReproducibility of Resultsbrain–computer interfacemovement intentionmovement-related cortical potentialneurorehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32423133
PMCPMC7287803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.