Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32423060›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Comparative Process Mining Analysis of Road Trauma Patient Pathways.

Robert Andrews, Moe T Wynn, Kirsten Vallmuur, Arthur H M Ter Hofstede, Emma Bosley

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert AndrewsQueensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Information Systems, Brisbane 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7743-5772
Moe T WynnQueensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Information Systems, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Kirsten VallmuurQueensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI), Brisbane 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-0822
Arthur H M Ter HofstedeQueensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Information Systems, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Emma BosleyQueensland Ambulance Service (QAS), Brisbane 4034, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4645-613X
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we report on key findings and lessons from a process mining case study conducted to analyse transport pathways discovered across the time-critical phase of pre-hospital care for persons involved in road traffic crashes in Queensland (Australia). In this study, a case is defined as being an individual patient's journey from roadside to definitive care. We describe challenges in constructing an event log from source data provided by emergency services and hospitals, including record linkage (no standard patient identifier), and constructing a unified view of response, retrieval, transport and pre-hospital care from interleaving processes of the individual service providers. We analyse three separate cohorts of patients according to their degree of interaction with Queensland Health's hospital system (C1:no transport required, C2:transported but no Queensland Health hospital, C3:transported and hospitalisation). Variant analysis and subsequent process modelling show high levels of variance in each cohort resulting from a combination of data collection, data linkage and actual differences in process execution. For Cohort 3, automated process modelling generated 'spaghetti' models. Expert-guided editing resulted in readable models with acceptable fitness, which were used for process analysis. We also conduct a comparative performance analysis of transport segment based on hospital `remoteness'. With regard to the field of process mining, we reach various conclusions including (i) in a complex domain, the current crop of automated process algorithms do not generate readable models, however, (ii) such models provide a starting point for expert-guided editing of models (where the tool allows) which can yield models that have acceptable quality and are readable by domain experts, (iii) process improvement opportunities were largely suggested by domain experts (after reviewing analysis results) rather than being directly derived by process mining tools, meaning that the field needs to become more prescriptive (automated derivation of improvement opportunities).

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalAustraliaHospitalizationHospitalsHumansQueenslandambulancecase studydata qualityhealthcareprocess miningvariant analysis

Identifiers

PMID32423060
PMCPMC7277496
OpenAlexW3024979487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.