ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm mimicking an ovarian cyst: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Low-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasm mimicking an ovarian lesion: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN) Primarily Diagnosed as an Ovarian Mucinous Tumor.Case reports in surgery · 2021Article
- A general overview of mucocele of appendix.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAppendiceal mucocele (AM) is a very rare neoplasm with an incidence of 0.2-0.3% of all appendectomy specimens. AM usually defined as an intraluminal dilation of the appendix in response to mucin accumulation. The preoperative diagnosis is difficult and can be misdiagnosed to any of the other differential diagnosis especially in female patients. If it is suspected, imaging modalities and colonoscopy can be helpful as a guide for the right surgical approach. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 41-year-old lady who found to have an appendicular tumor discovered incidentally on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen during a follow-up in the referral hospital for persistent right lower quadrant abdominal pain with enlarging right ovarian cyst for 2 years. MRI revealed a sizeable cyst measuring 7 × 4 × 3 cm in the right iliac fossa (RIF) region with high suspicion of an AM. The patient was managed with open right limited hemicolectomy. The patient was diagnosed as a well-differentiated low-grade AM neoplasm with stage 0 (pTis, pN0, M0) based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System. The patient had an uneventful recovery and advised for regular follow-up of at least 5 years. DISCUSSION: AM is a very rare neoplasm. The imaging modalities that can be diagnostic methods are the abdominal ultrasonography (US), transvaginal US, abdominal computed tomography (CT) and abdominal MRI. Fine needle aspiration must be avoided as the risk of perforation is high that will lead to dissemination of the mucinous material causing a serious complication called pseudomyxoma peritonei. Laparotomy is superior on laparoscopy as the risk of perforation is lower in laparotomy.
conclusionThe presentation of AM is usually not specific, because of its anatomic position. Physicians should consider it in the differential diagnosis of persistent enlarging ovarian cyst or adnexal mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.