Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32422154›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology2020

Recommendations for Long-Term Follow-up of Adults with Heritable Retinoblastoma.

Emily S Tonorezos, Danielle Novetsky Friedman, Dana Barnea, Machteld I Bosscha, Guillermo Chantada, Charlotte J Dommering, Pim de Graaf, Ira J Dunkel, Armida W M Fabius, Jasmine H Francis and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Update on Retinoblastoma Therapies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  9. [Liquid biopsy in retinoblastomas].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New Insights into Melanoma Tumor Syndromes.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Review
  17. Premalignant Conditions of Bone.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Emily S TonorezosMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: tonoreze@mskcc.org.
Danielle Novetsky FriedmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Dana BarneaTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Machteld I BosschaAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Guillermo ChantadaHospital Juan P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Charlotte J DommeringAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim de GraafAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ira J DunkelMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Armida W M FabiusAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jasmine H FrancisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mary-Louise C GreerHospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ruth A KleinermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Wijnanda A KorsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne LaughlinHospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Annette C MollAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lindsay M MortonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Petra TemmingEssen University, Essen, Germany.
Margaret A TuckerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Flora E van LeeuwenNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michael F WalshMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kevin C OeffingerDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
David H AbramsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo generate recommendations for long-term follow-up of adult survivors of heritable retinoblastoma.

designWe convened a meeting of providers from retinoblastoma centers around the world to review the state of the science and to evaluate the published evidence.

participantsRetinoblastoma is a rare childhood cancer of the retina. Approximately 40% of retinoblastoma cases are heritable, resulting from a germline mutation in RB1. Dramatic improvements in treatment and supportive care have resulted in a growing adult survivor population. However, survivors of heritable retinoblastoma have a significantly increased risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms, particularly bone and soft tissue sarcomas, uterine leiomyosarcoma, melanomas, and radiotherapy-related central nervous system tumors, which are associated with excess morbidity and mortality. Despite these risks, no surveillance recommendations for this population currently are in place, and surveillance practices vary widely by center.

methodsFollowing the Institute of Medicine procedure for clinical practice guideline development, a PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science search was performed, resulting in 139 articles; after abstract and full-text review, 37 articles underwent detailed data abstraction to quantify risk and evidence regarding surveillance, if available. During an in-person meeting, evidence was presented and discussed, resulting in consensus recommendations.

main outcome measuresDiagnosis and mortality from subsequent neoplasm.

resultsAlthough evidence for risk of subsequent neoplasm, especially sarcoma and melanoma, was significant, evidence supporting routine testing of asymptomatic survivors was not identified. Skin examination for melanoma and prompt evaluation of signs and symptoms of head and neck disease were determined to be prudent.

conclusionsThis review of the literature confirmed some of the common second cancers in retinoblastoma survivors but found little evidence for a benefit from currently available surveillance for these malignancies. Future research should incorporate international partners, patients, and family members.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGuidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentFollow-Up StudiesGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32422154
PMCPMC7606265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.