Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421829›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Domains, tasks, and knowledge for health informatics practice: results of a practice analysis.

Cynthia S Gadd, Elaine B Steen, Carla M Caro, Sandra Greenberg, Jeffrey J Williamson, Douglas B Fridsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of All of Us data to increase health literacy and research skills in high school students.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. JAMIA at 30: looking back and forward.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  7. Mapping the delineation of practice to the AMIA foundational domains for applied health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. The relationship between biomedical and health informatics and society: is it time for a social contract?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  9. Nursing Informatics' Contribution to One Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient safety and quality of care: a key focus for clinical informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ASHP Foundation Pharmacy Forecast 2021: Strategic Planning Advice for Pharmacy Departments in Hospitals and Health Systems.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Informatics is a critical strategy in combating the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  20. Strengthening our profession by defining clinical and health informatics practice.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia S GaddDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Elaine B SteenAmerican Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carla M CaroACT-ProExam, New York, NY, USA.
Sandra GreenbergACT-ProExam, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey J WilliamsonAmerican Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Douglas B Fridsma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a comprehensive and current description of what health informatics (HI) professionals do and what they need to know. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix independent subject-matter expert panels drawn from and representative of HI professionals contributed to the development of a draft HI delineation of practice (DoP). An online survey was distributed to HI professionals to validate the draft DoP. A total of 1011 HI practitioners completed the survey. Survey respondents provided domain, task, knowledge and skill (KS) ratings, qualitative feedback on the completeness of the DoP, and detailed professional background and demographic information.

resultsThis practice analysis resulted in a validated, comprehensive, and contemporary DoP comprising 5 domains, 74 tasks, and 144 KS statements. DISCUSSION: The HI practice analysis defined "health informatics professionals" to include practitioners with clinical (eg, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy), public health, and HI or computer science training. The affirmation of the DoP by reviewers and survey respondents reflects the emergence of a core set of tasks performed and KSs used by informaticians representing a broad spectrum of those currently practicing in the field.

conclusionThe HI practice analysis represents the first time that HI professionals have been surveyed to validate a description of their practice. The resulting HI DoP is an important milestone in the maturation of HI as a profession and will inform HI certification, accreditation, and education activities.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAdvisory CommitteesAgedCertificationDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional CompetenceSocieties, MedicalUnited Statescertificationdelineation of practicehealth informaticspractice analysisworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID32421829
PMCPMC7647284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.