ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602020
Trends and Characteristics of Clinical Trials Participation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: A Report From IBD Partners.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition position paper on the therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Guideline
- Risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing vedolizumab treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Use of external control arms in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Advancing Equity and Patient Partnership in Clinical Trials for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Model for Inclusive Trial Design.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Special Circumstances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Generalizability of Randomized Controlled Trials to Routine Clinical Care in Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Incorporating Real-World Variability in Clinical IBD Research.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Research Participation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Studies: What Do Patients Want?Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2025Article
- Clinical trials and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease.Health care transitions · 2025Article
- Patient and Public Involvement in Research: Lessons for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2023Review
- Validating the Simplified Endoscopic Mucosal Assessment for Crohn's Disease: A Novel Method for Assessing Disease Activity.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Article
- Ustekinumab Versus Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents as Second-Line Biologics in Crohn's Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Racial or ethnic differences on treatment adherence and persistence among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiated with biologic therapies.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Observational
- A model for building a national, patient-driven database to track contraceptive use in women with rare diseases.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Reversing the Tide: Improving the Recruitment of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Clinical Trials in the United States.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThere are currently several recruitment challenges in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which prolong the drug approval process and affect the generalizability of study results. The purpose of this study is to characterize individuals who participate in IBD RCTs and identify factors that could influence future recruitment strategies.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study within the IBD Partners cohort comparing patients with current or prior participation in an RCT of medical therapy for IBD to those without any RCT participation. Bivariate statistics were used to compare RCT participation by IBD subtype and by other demographic and disease characteristics, and predictive modeling was used to identify factors predictive of RCT participation. We calculated the percent of the cohort that participated in an RCT during each calendar year from 2011 to 2018 and accessed Clinicaltrials.gov to determine the number of active RCTs for IBD therapies per year during that same period.
resultsA total of 14,747 patients with IBD were included in the analysis and 1116 (7.6%) reported RCT participation at any time. Demographic factors predictive of RCT participation included following at an academic institution [odds ratio (OR) = 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-2.04) and age 36-75 (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.46-1.92). Patients with Crohn's disease were more likely to participate than those with ulcerative colitis (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.35-1.77). Patients with more severe disease were more likely to participate, including those with prior IBD-related hospitalization (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 2.19-2.99), IBD-related surgery (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 2.24-2.87), biologic exposure (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 2.76-3.65), and "Poor" or worse quality of life (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.45-1.93). Steroid-free remission was associated with a lower likelihood of RCT participation (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.53-0.70). Although the number of active RCTs for IBD more than doubled between 2011 and 2018, RCT participation rates during that same time period decreased from 1.1% to 0.7% of the cohort.
conclusionsRCT participation declined within this cohort. Groups underrepresented in RCTs for IBD included younger patients, patients followed in community settings, and patients with more mild disease. The non-RCT group had mean disease activity scores that did not meet remission thresholds, demonstrating populations in need of alternate therapies for whom clinical trials could be an option. Given anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) exposure rates in this national cohort, studies should focus on anti-TNF failure populations. Investigators should make every effort to offer RCTs to all patients and network with community providers to increase awareness of RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.