Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421717›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Medications for opioid use disorder among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies before and after Medicaid expansion: A retrospective study of admissions to treatment centers in the United States.

Tyler N A Winkelman, Becky R Ford, Rebecca J Shlafer, Anna McWilliams, Lindsay K Admon, Stephen W Patrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler N A WinkelmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Becky R FordHealth, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rebecca J ShlaferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-9053
Anna McWilliamsHealth, Homelessness, and Criminal Justice Lab, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4426-4783
Lindsay K AdmonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-9711
Stephen W PatrickVanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6958-0371
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Improving Access to Treatment for Women with Opioid Use DisorderR01DA045729 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATRICK, STEPHEN W · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCriminal justice involvement is common among pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD improve pregnancy-related outcomes, but trends in treatment data among justice-involved pregnant women are limited. We sought to examine trends in medications for OUD among pregnant women referred to treatment by criminal justice agencies and other sources before and after the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis using 1992-2017 data from pregnant women admitted to treatment facilities for OUD using a national survey of substance use treatment facilities in the United States (N = 131,838). We used multiple logistic regression and difference-in-differences methods to assess trends in medications for OUD by referral source. Women in the sample were predominantly aged 18-29 (63.3%), white non-Hispanic, high school graduates, and not employed. Over the study period, 26.3% (95% CI 25.7-27.0) of pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies received medications for OUD, which was significantly less than those with individual referrals (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.43-0.46; P < 0.001) or those referred from other sources (ARR 0.51, 95% CI 0.50-0.53; P < 0.001). Among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies, receipt of medications for OUD increased significantly more in states that expanded Medicaid (n = 32) compared with nonexpansion states (n = 18) (adjusted difference-in-differences: 12.0 percentage points, 95% CI 1.0-23.0; P = 0.03). Limitations of this study include encounters that are at treatment centers only and that do not encompass buprenorphine prescribed in ambulatory care settings, prisons, or jails.

conclusionsPregnant women with OUD referred by criminal justice agencies received evidence-based treatment at lower rates than women referred through other sources. Improving access to medications for OUD for pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies could provide public health benefits to mothers, infants, and communities. Medicaid expansion is a potential mechanism for expanding access to evidence-based treatment for pregnant women in the US.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentAdultEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMedicaidOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32421717
PMCPMC7233523
OpenAlexW3024007319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.