Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421716›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Stimulus-choice (mis)alignment in primate area MT.

Yuan Zhao, Jacob L Yates, Aaron J Levi, Alexander C Huk, Il Memming Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Active vision in freely moving marmosets using head-mounted eye tracking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Neuronal and Behavioral Responses to Naturalistic Texture Images in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensory and Choice Responses in MT Distinct from Motion Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan ZhaoDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6123-8579
Jacob L YatesBrain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-5982
Aaron J LeviCenter for Perceptual Systems, Departments of Neuroscience & Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Alexander C HukCenter for Perceptual Systems, Departments of Neuroscience & Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Il Memming ParkDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSCIENCET32DA018926 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Nace L Golding, AMY LEE · 2004 to 2026
$5.6M
Neural time-integration underlying higher cognitive functionR01EY017366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HUK, ALEXANDER C, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2008 to 2016
$2.9M
CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017366NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA018926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For stimuli near perceptual threshold, the trial-by-trial activity of single neurons in many sensory areas is correlated with the animal's perceptual report. This phenomenon has often been attributed to feedforward readout of the neural activity by the downstream decision-making circuits. The interpretation of choice-correlated activity is quite ambiguous, but its meaning can be better understood in the light of population-wide correlations among sensory neurons. Using a statistical nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique on single-trial ensemble recordings from the middle temporal (MT) area during perceptual-decision-making, we extracted low-dimensional latent factors that captured the population-wide fluctuations. We dissected the particular contributions of sensory-driven versus choice-correlated activity in the low-dimensional population code. We found that the latent factors strongly encoded the direction of the stimulus in single dimension with a temporal signature similar to that of single MT neurons. If the downstream circuit were optimally utilizing this information, choice-correlated signals should be aligned with this stimulus encoding dimension. Surprisingly, we found that a large component of the choice information resides in the subspace orthogonal to the stimulus representation inconsistent with the optimal readout view. This misaligned choice information allows the feedforward sensory information to coexist with the decision-making process. The time course of these signals suggest that this misaligned contribution likely is feedback from the downstream areas. We hypothesize that this non-corrupting choice-correlated feedback might be related to learning or reinforcing sensory-motor relations in the sensory population.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexChoice BehaviorDecision MakingDepth PerceptionFeedback, SensoryFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleModels, TheoreticalPhotic StimulationSensory Receptor CellsTemporal LobeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID32421716
PMCPMC7259805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.