Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421635›Full record

ArticleApplied ergonomics2020

Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.

Nicole E Werner, Rachel Rutkowski, Amy Graske, Mary K Finta, Craig R Sellers, Sandhya Seshadri, Manish N Shah

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied ergonomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E WernerDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: nwerner3@wisc.edu.
Rachel RutkowskiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: zenker@wisc.edu.
Amy GraskeAbout Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: amy.graske@outlook.com.
Mary K FintaUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: finta@wisc.edu.
Craig R SellersSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Craig_Sellers@URMC.Rochester.edu.
Sandhya SeshadriSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Sandhya_Seshadri@urmc.rochester.edu.
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: manish.shah@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
Mentoring and Research in Patient-Oriented Geriatric Emergency CareK24AG054560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHAH, MANISH N · 2017 to 2021
$955k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054560NIA NIH HHS L30 AG064737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care transitions across healthcare settings, specifically between the emergency department (ED) and the home, are pervasive among older adults, and represent persistent healthcare quality and safety challenges. Care transitions cross multiple distinct work systems, representing a conceptual and methodological challenge for the field of Human Factors/Ergonomics - how to analyze a process that occurs across multiple work systems. As an initial step in determining how to study care transitions across work systems, we applied the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 model, specifically the concept of configuration, to explore older adults' ED-to-home transitions. Our results suggest that configuration is useful for identifying and modeling work system barriers that interact across systems, but does not explicitly allow for the identification and analysis of the system boundaries that are crossed. To fully capture the complexity associated with care transitions, future iterations of SEIPS should introduce a mechanism to capture specific boundary types, so that system analysis can capture when and which boundaries are crossed.

Indexed as

Systems AnalysisAgedErgonomicsFemaleHumansMalePatient SafetyQuality Assurance, Health CareSystems IntegrationTransitional CareCare transitionsEmergency departmentOlder adultsSociotechnical systemsWork systems

Identifiers

PMID32421635
PMCPMC7400988
OpenAlexW3025076393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.