Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421226›Full record

Trial reportThoracic cancer2020

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion uncontrolled by tube drainage or pleurodesis: A phase II study North East Japan Study group trial NEJ013B.

Rintaro Noro, Kunihiko Kobayashi, Jiro Usuki, Makiko Yomota, Masaru Nishitsuji, Tsuneo Shimokawa, Masahiro Ando, Mitsunori Hino, Koichi Hagiwara, Akihiko Miyanaga and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. OsimertinibTranslational lung cancer research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Anti-angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Progress and Confusion].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Rintaro NoroDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4912-4138
Kunihiko KobayashiDepartment of Respiratory medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Jiro UsukiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Makiko YomotaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru NishitsujiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tsuneo ShimokawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Medical Oncology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Masahiro AndoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jizankai Medical Foundation Tsuboi Cancer Center Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Mitsunori HinoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokuso Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Koichi HagiwaraDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Akihiko MiyanagaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro SeikeDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaoru KubotaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko GemmaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
North East Japan Study group
Nippon Medical School · JPChiba Hokusou Hospital · JPFukushima Medical University Hospital · JPIshikawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPSaitama International Medical Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPYokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital · JP

Funding

Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical SchoolKyoto UniversitySaitama Medical University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPleurodesis is the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, there is no standard management for MPE uncontrolled by pleurodesis. Most patients with unsuccessful MPE control are unable to receive effective chemotherapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MPE. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the effects of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with unsuccessful management of MPE.

methodsNonsquamous NSCLC patients with MPE following unsuccessful tube drainage or pleurodesis received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) plus chemotherapy every three weeks. The primary endpoint was pleural effusion control rate (PECR), defined as the percentage of patients without reaccumulation of MPE at eight weeks. Secondary endpoints included pleural progression-free survival (PPFS), safety, and quality of life (QoL).

resultsA total of 20 patients (median age: 69 years; 14 males; 20 adenocarcinomas; six epidermal growth factor receptor mutations) were enrolled in nine centers. The PECR was 80% and the primary end point was met. The PPFS and the overall survival (OS) were 16.6 months and 19.6 months, respectively. Patients with high levels of VEGF in the MPE had shorter PPFS (P = 0.010) and OS (P = 0.002). Toxicities of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (10%), proteinuria (10%), and hypertension (2%). The cognitive QoL score improved after treatment.

conclusionsBevacizumab plus chemotherapy is highly effective with acceptable toxicities in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with uncontrolled MPE, and should be considered as a standard therapy in this setting. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is highly effective with acceptable toxicities in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with uncontrolled MPE. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy should be considered as a standard treatment option for patients with uncontrolled MPE. CLINICAL

trial registrationUMIN000006868 was a phase II study of efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with MPE unsuccessfully controlled by tube drainage or pleurodesis (North East Japan Study Group Trial NEJ-013B) (http://umin.sc.jp/ctr/).

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPemetrexedBevacizumabCarboplatinDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochloridePemetrexedBevacizumab plus chemotherapynon-small cell lung cancerunsuccessful management of malignant pleural effusionvascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID32421226
PMCPMC7327672
OpenAlexW3026382650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.