Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421195›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Significant Regional Differences in Antibiotic Use Across 576 US Hospitals and 11 701 326 Adult Admissions, 2016-2017.

Katherine E Goodman, Sara E Cosgrove, Lisa Pineles, Laurence S Magder, Deverick J Anderson, Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, Ronald E Polk, Hude Quan, William E Trick, Keith F Woeltje and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07556107 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Renal Effects of Vancomycin Combined With Either Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07556107 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Renal Effects of Vancomycin Combined With Either Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem: VPT Patient Safety (VPS) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBassett HealthcareRan2026 to 2028Enrolled852ConditionsInfection, Acute Kidney Injury, SepsisArmsPiperacillin + Tazobactam, meropenem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antibiotic consumption patterns in acute care hospitals: an integrated analysis using regression modelling combining data from two surveillance systems, Germany, 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Correlation between carbapenem susceptibility inAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine E GoodmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-775X
Sara E CosgroveDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lisa PinelesDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Laurence S MagderDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deverick J AndersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth Dodds AshleyDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ronald E PolkSchool of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Hude QuanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
William E TrickCook County Health and Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Keith F WoeltjeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Surbhi LeekhaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anthony D HarrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USDuke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAVirginia Commonwealth University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Use of electronic data to improve risk adjustment for antibiotic utilization metricsR01HS026205 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HARRIS, ANTHONY D · 2018 to 2020
$1.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantifying the amount and diversity of antibiotic use in United States hospitals assists antibiotic stewardship efforts but is hampered by limited national surveillance. Our study aimed to address this knowledge gap by examining adult antibiotic use across 576 hospitals and nearly 12 million encounters in 2016-2017.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients aged ≥ 18 years discharged from hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017. Using daily antibiotic charge data, we mapped antibiotics to mutually exclusive classes and to spectrum of activity categories. We evaluated relationships between facility and case-mix characteristics and antibiotic use in negative binomial regression models.

resultsThe study included 11 701 326 admissions, totaling 64 064 632 patient-days, across 576 hospitals. Overall, patients received antibiotics in 65% of hospitalizations, at a crude rate of 870 days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. By class, use was highest among β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and glycopeptides. Teaching hospitals averaged lower rates of total antibiotic use than nonteaching hospitals (834 vs 957 DOT per 1000 patient-days; P < .001). In adjusted models, teaching hospitals remained associated with lower use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and antipseudomonal agents (adjusted incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.92 [.86-.97] and 0.91 [.85-.98], respectively). Significant regional differences in total and class-specific antibiotic use also persisted in adjusted models.

conclusionsAdult inpatient antibiotic use remains high, driven predominantly by broad-spectrum agents. Better understanding reasons for interhospital usage differences, including by region and teaching status, may inform efforts to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipAdultHospitalsHumansPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic stewardshipantimicrobial useinpatientsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32421195
PMCPMC8282314
OpenAlexW3026423035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.